Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Phil Tinn

dblp:426/1794 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4977-7465ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% Design research and methods · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › social media
social media analysis
1.012026
With Visual Integrity and Care: A Framework for Mixed Methods Research on Visual Social Data · CHI 2026
Design research and methods › research methodology
mixed-methods study
0.312026
With Visual Integrity and Care: A Framework for Mixed Methods Research on Visual Social Data · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case study · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 With Visual Integrity and Care: A Framework for Mixed Methods Research on Visual Social Data
abstract
The internet is becoming increasingly visual, but social computing research and methodological training has relied heavily on textual methods. Methodological innovation is needed to study visual social data, including problematic information (mis- and disinformation, propaganda, hate, AI slop, etc). Contending with this, we present a framework for conducting grounded, interpretive, computationally supported, mixed-method research on collections of visual social media data. We developed this framework while grappling with the ethical, logistical, and methodological challenges of conducting in-depth analysis of potentially harmful visual content while caring for our research team. We document our framework components of visual grammars, human analysis, and computationally supported analysis with an umbrella commitment to care and its use in three empirical case studies. We also provide recommendations and implications for the HCI community in embracing training in and the advancing of visual methods and research, including a sensitizing concept of visual integrity.
Nina Lutz, Joseph S. Schafer, Priya Dhawka, Phil Tinn, Kate Starbird
CHI4