Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ashley Scadden
dblp:426/6675
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7603-1442ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology
microbiome analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | EXPLANA: a user-friendly workflow for EXPLoratory ANAlysis and feature selection in cross-sectional and longitudinal microbiome studies · Bioinform. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed effects model · 1.0machine learning · 1.0change analysis · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | EXPLANA: a user-friendly workflow for EXPLoratory ANAlysis and feature selection in cross-sectional and longitudinal microbiome studiesabstractMOTIVATION: Longitudinal microbiome studies (LMS) are increasingly common but have analytic challenges including nonindependent data requiring mixed-effects models. Furthermore, large amounts of data motivate exploratory analysis to identify factors related to outcome variables. Although change analysis (i.e. calculating feature changes between timepoints) can be powerful, how to best conduct these analyses is often unclear. For example, observational LMS measurements show natural fluctuations, so baseline might not be a reference of primary interest, whereas for interventional LMS, baseline is typically a key reference point, often indicating the start of treatment. RESULTS: To address these challenges, a feature selection workflow, called EXPLANA (EXPLoratory ANAlysis), was developed for LMS that supports numerical and categorical data, and also accommodates cross-sectional studies. Machine learning methods were combined with different types of change calculations and downstream interpretation methods to identify statistically meaningful variables and explain their relationship to outcomes. EXPLANA generates an interactive report that textually and graphically summarizes methods and results. EXPLANA had good performance on simulated longitudinal data, with a balanced accuracy score of 0.91 (range: 0.79-1.00, SD = 0.05), outperformed an existing tool, QIIME 2 feature-volatility (balanced accuracy: 0.95 versus 0.56) and identified novel order-dependent categorical feature changes (e.g. different effect for A_B versus B_A). EXPLANA is broadly applicable and simplifies analytics for identifying features related to outcomes of interest. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software is available at https://github.com/JTFouquier/explana and https://zenodo.org/records/17478745 (10.5281/zenodo.17478744). Documentation and demos are available at www.explana.io. Jennifer T. Fouquier, Maggie Stanislawski, John O'Connor, Ashley Scadden, Catherine A. Lozupone |
Bioinform. | 4 |