Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuguang Jiao
dblp:427/0970
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-5711-5910ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 33% Query processing and optimization · 33% Knowledge graphs · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph reasoning
multi-hop reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PruneRAG: Confidence-Guided Query Decomposition Trees for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation · WWW 2026 |
Query processing and optimization › query rewriting › query transformation
query decomposition |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PruneRAG: Confidence-Guided Query Decomposition Trees for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation · WWW 2026 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PruneRAG: Confidence-Guided Query Decomposition Trees for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.0confidence-guided pruning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PruneRAG: Confidence-Guided Query Decomposition Trees for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented GenerationabstractRetrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a powerful framework for enhancing large language models in knowledge-intensive and reasoning tasks. However, as reasoning chains deepen or search trees expand, RAG systems often face two persistent failures: evidence forgetting, where retrieved knowledge is not effectively used, and inefficiency, caused by uncontrolled query expansions and redundant retrieval. These issues reveal a critical gap between retrieval and evidence utilization in current RAG architectures. We propose PruneRAG, a confidence-guided query decomposition framework that builds a structured query decomposition tree to perform stable and efficient reasoning. PruneRAG introduces three key mechanisms: adaptive node expansion that regulates tree width and depth, confidence-guided decisions that accept reliable answers and prune uncertain branches, and fine-grained retrieval that extracts entity-level anchors to improve retrieval precision. Together, these components preserve salient evidence throughout multi-hop reasoning while significantly reducing retrieval overhead. To better analyze evidence misuse, we define the Evidence Forgetting Rate as a metric to quantify cases where golden evidence is retrieved but not correctly used. Extensive experiments across various multi-hop QA benchmarks show that PruneRAG achieves superior accuracy and efficiency over state-of-the-art baselines. The code is publicly available. Shuguang Jiao, Xinyu Xiao, Yunfan Wei, Shuhan Qi, Chengkai Huang, Quan Z. Sheng, Lina Yao 0001 |
WWW | 1 |