Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Özcan
dblp:427/6458
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
actual causality |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reasoning About Actual Causality in Answer Set Programming · KR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic programming
answer set programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reasoning About Actual Causality in Answer Set Programming · KR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reasoning About Actual Causality in Answer Set Programming · KR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reasoning About Actual Causality in Answer Set Programming · KR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
answer set programming · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Reasoning About Actual Causality in Answer Set ProgrammingabstractCausal models provide a formal framework for identifying and reasoning about the causes of observed phenomena, making them valuable for decision-support contexts where understanding causality is essential. Yet applying these models in practice requires automated tools for key reasoning tasks. We present an Answer Set Programming (ASP)-based tool that supports three core capabilities for all acyclic binary causal models: (1) checking whether an event is an actual cause of another; (2) finding all minimal subsets of a failed candidate that do qualify as causes; and (3) inferring all actual causes of an outcome without assuming any candidate. Our tool is the first to support all three tasks within a unified framework, guaranteeing minimal contingency sets and outperforming prior implementations in both runtime and memory. We describe the system’s design and report on an empirical evaluation using existing benchmarks. Daniel Özcan, Dalal Alrajeh, Robert Craven |
KR | 1 |