Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Minseo Kwak
dblp:427/8839
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Gap-K%: Measuring Top-1 Prediction Gap for Detecting Pretraining Data · ACL (1) 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › membership inference
pretraining data detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Gap-K%: Measuring Top-1 Prediction Gap for Detecting Pretraining Data · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
large language model pretraining |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Gap-K%: Measuring Top-1 Prediction Gap for Detecting Pretraining Data · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
token likelihood analysis · 2.0sliding window · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Gap-K%: Measuring Top-1 Prediction Gap for Detecting Pretraining DataabstractThe opacity of massive pretraining corpora in Large Language Models (LLMs) raises significant privacy and copyright concerns, making pretraining data detection a critical challenge.Existing state-of-the-art methods typically rely on token likelihoods, yet they often overlook the gap between the target token and the model's top-1 prediction, as well as local correlations between adjacent tokens.In this work, we propose Gap-K%, a novel pretraining data detection method grounded in the optimization dynamics of LLM pretraining.By analyzing the next-token prediction objective, we observe that discrepancies between the model's top-1 prediction and the target token induce strong gradient signals, which are explicitly penalized during training.Motivated by this, Gap-K% leverages the log probability gap between the top-1 predicted token and the target token, incorporating a sliding window strategy to capture local correlations and mitigate tokenlevel fluctuations.Extensive experiments on the WikiMIA and MIMIR benchmarks demonstrate that Gap-K% achieves state-of-the-art performance, consistently outperforming prior baselines across various model sizes and input lengths 1 . Minseo Kwak |
ACL (1) | 1 |