Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Minseo Kwak

dblp:427/8839 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
1.012026
Gap-K%: Measuring Top-1 Prediction Gap for Detecting Pretraining Data · ACL (1) 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › membership inference
pretraining data detection
1.012026
Gap-K%: Measuring Top-1 Prediction Gap for Detecting Pretraining Data · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
large language model pretraining
0.312026
Gap-K%: Measuring Top-1 Prediction Gap for Detecting Pretraining Data · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

token likelihood analysis · 2.0sliding window · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Gap-K%: Measuring Top-1 Prediction Gap for Detecting Pretraining Data
abstract
The opacity of massive pretraining corpora in Large Language Models (LLMs) raises significant privacy and copyright concerns, making pretraining data detection a critical challenge.Existing state-of-the-art methods typically rely on token likelihoods, yet they often overlook the gap between the target token and the model's top-1 prediction, as well as local correlations between adjacent tokens.In this work, we propose Gap-K%, a novel pretraining data detection method grounded in the optimization dynamics of LLM pretraining.By analyzing the next-token prediction objective, we observe that discrepancies between the model's top-1 prediction and the target token induce strong gradient signals, which are explicitly penalized during training.Motivated by this, Gap-K% leverages the log probability gap between the top-1 predicted token and the target token, incorporating a sliding window strategy to capture local correlations and mitigate tokenlevel fluctuations.Extensive experiments on the WikiMIA and MIMIR benchmarks demonstrate that Gap-K% achieves state-of-the-art performance, consistently outperforming prior baselines across various model sizes and input lengths 1 .
Minseo Kwak
ACL (1)1