EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sascha Ankersmit
dblp:429/1388
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-8577-3551ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 70% Human-AI interaction · 30% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
affective computing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The 'Aww' Factor: Robot Cuteness as a Catalyst for Emotional Responses and Caretaking Tendencies · HRI 2026 |
Human-robot interaction › emotion
emotional response |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The 'Aww' Factor: Robot Cuteness as a Catalyst for Emotional Responses and Caretaking Tendencies · HRI 2026 |
Human-robot interaction
anthropomorphism |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | The 'Aww' Factor: Robot Cuteness as a Catalyst for Emotional Responses and Caretaking Tendencies · HRI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
path analysis · 1.0online survey · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The 'Aww' Factor: Robot Cuteness as a Catalyst for Emotional Responses and Caretaking TendenciesabstractCuteness is a key factor in human-human interaction. Infant cuteness, described by Lorenz’s baby schema, is thought to promote infant survival by eliciting caregiving behaviors and positive emotions. Despite evidence that people prefer to interact with cute robots, the specific mechanisms through which cuteness influences human–robot interaction remain poorly understood. This research investigated the relationship between perceived robot cuteness, emotional responses, and caretaking tendencies. In two online surveys, participants rated all robots from the ABOT database. In survey 1, 156 participants evaluated robots’ perceived cuteness and the extent to which they evoked positive and negative emotions. In survey 2, a separate pool of 152 participants rated the caretaking tendencies elicited by the robots. Results showed that cuteness was positively correlated with positive emotions and caretaking tendencies, and negatively correlated with negative emotions. Path analysis revealed that the effect of cuteness on caretaking tendencies was partially mediated by participants’ emotional responses. Consistent with the baby-schema hypothesis, cuteness was negatively associated with perceived robot age and positively with the presence of facial features. Interestingly, participants' individual characteristics, most notably their tendency to anthropomorphize, influenced the responses. Our findings confirm the importance of robot cuteness for HRI and extend theories of baby schema to artificial agents. They also raise ethical considerations: while cuteness is a powerful design feature that facilitates affective bonding with robots, its persuasive potential should not be used lightly. Cute robots may foster care and trust, but these same mechanisms could be exploited to manipulate users in harmful ways. Giulia Perugia, Sascha Ankersmit, Nadia Jansen, Stefano Guidi |
HRI | 2 |