Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Nadia Jansen

dblp:429/1506 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-6347-8927ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 70% Human-AI interaction · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
affective computing
1.012026
The 'Aww' Factor: Robot Cuteness as a Catalyst for Emotional Responses and Caretaking Tendencies · HRI 2026
Human-robot interaction › emotion
emotional response
1.012026
The 'Aww' Factor: Robot Cuteness as a Catalyst for Emotional Responses and Caretaking Tendencies · HRI 2026
Human-robot interaction
anthropomorphism
0.312026
The 'Aww' Factor: Robot Cuteness as a Catalyst for Emotional Responses and Caretaking Tendencies · HRI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

path analysis · 1.0online survey · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 The 'Aww' Factor: Robot Cuteness as a Catalyst for Emotional Responses and Caretaking Tendencies
abstract
Cuteness is a key factor in human-human interaction. Infant cuteness, described by Lorenz’s baby schema, is thought to promote infant survival by eliciting caregiving behaviors and positive emotions. Despite evidence that people prefer to interact with cute robots, the specific mechanisms through which cuteness influences human–robot interaction remain poorly understood. This research investigated the relationship between perceived robot cuteness, emotional responses, and caretaking tendencies. In two online surveys, participants rated all robots from the ABOT database. In survey 1, 156 participants evaluated robots’ perceived cuteness and the extent to which they evoked positive and negative emotions. In survey 2, a separate pool of 152 participants rated the caretaking tendencies elicited by the robots. Results showed that cuteness was positively correlated with positive emotions and caretaking tendencies, and negatively correlated with negative emotions. Path analysis revealed that the effect of cuteness on caretaking tendencies was partially mediated by participants’ emotional responses. Consistent with the baby-schema hypothesis, cuteness was negatively associated with perceived robot age and positively with the presence of facial features. Interestingly, participants' individual characteristics, most notably their tendency to anthropomorphize, influenced the responses. Our findings confirm the importance of robot cuteness for HRI and extend theories of baby schema to artificial agents. They also raise ethical considerations: while cuteness is a powerful design feature that facilitates affective bonding with robots, its persuasive potential should not be used lightly. Cute robots may foster care and trust, but these same mechanisms could be exploited to manipulate users in harmful ways.
Giulia Perugia, Sascha Ankersmit, Nadia Jansen, Stefano Guidi
HRI3