Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maarten F. Brilman

dblp:429/2445 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-6108-9673ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia analysis
multimodal behavior analysis
0.212015
A Multimodal Predictive Model of Successful Debaters or How I Learned to Sway Votes · ACM Multimedia 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal machine learning · 0.4fusion · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 A Multimodal Predictive Model of Successful Debaters or How I Learned to Sway Votes
abstract
Interpersonal skills such as public speaking are essential assets for a large variety of professions and in everyday life. The ability to communicate in social environments often greatly influences a person's career development, can help resolve conflict, gain the upper hand in negotiations, or sway the public opinion. We focus our investigations on a special form of public speaking, namely public debates of socioeconomic issues that affect us all. In particular, we analyze performances of expert debaters recorded through the Intelligence Squared U.S. (IQ2US) organization. IQ2US collects high-quality audiovisual recordings of these debates and publishes them online free of charge. We extract audiovisual nonverbal behavior descriptors, including facial expressions, voice quality characteristics, and surface level linguistic characteristics. Within our experiments we investigate if it is possible to automatically predict if a debater or his/her team are going to sway the most votes after the debate using multimodal machine learning and fusion approaches. We identify unimodal nonverbal behaviors that characterize successful debaters and our investigations reveal that multimodal machine learning approaches can reliably predict which individual (~75% accuracy) or team (85% accuracy) is going to win the most votes in the debate. We created a database consisting of over 30 debates with four speakers per debate suitable for public speaking skill analysis and plan to make this database publicly available for the research community.
Maarten F. Brilman, Stefan Scherer
ACM Multimedia1