EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sagnik Halder
dblp:429/4070
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
ising model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Logistic Regression Under Network Dependence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › generalized linear model
logistic regression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Logistic Regression Under Network Dependence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
statistical network models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Logistic Regression Under Network Dependence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Logistic Regression Under Network Dependence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
high-dimensional statistics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Logistic Regression Under Network Dependence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
penalized maximum pseudo-likelihood · 1.5ising model · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Logistic Regression Under Network DependenceabstractLogistic regression is a key method for modeling the probability of a binary outcome based on a collection of covariates. However, the classical formulation of logistic regression relies on the independent sampling assumption, which is often violated when the outcomes interact through an underlying network structure, such as over a temporal/spatial domain or on a social network. This necessitates the development of models that can simultaneously handle both the network 'peer-effect' (arising from neighborhood interactions) and the effect of (possibly) high-dimensional covariates. In this paper, we develop a framework for incorporating such dependencies in a high-dimensional logistic regression model by introducing a quadratic interaction term, as in the Ising model, designed to capture the pairwise interactions from the underlying network. The resulting model can also be viewed as an Ising model, where the node-dependent external fields linearly encode the high-dimensional covariates. We propose a penalized maximum pseudo-likelihood method for estimating the network peer-effect and the effect of the covariates (the regression coefficients), which, in addition to handling the high-dimensionality of the parameters, conveniently avoids the computational intractability of the maximum likelihood approach. Under various standard regularity conditions, we show that the corresponding estimate attains the classical high-dimensional rate of consistency. In particular, our results imply that even under network dependence it is possible to consistently estimate the model parameters at the same rate as in classical (independent) logistic regression, when the true parameter is sparse and the underlying network is not too dense. Consequently, we derive the rates of consistency of our proposed estimator for various natural graph ensembles, such as bounded degree graphs, sparse Erd\H{o}s-Rényi random graphs, and stochastic block models. We also develop an efficient algorithm for computing the estimates and validate our theoretical results in numerical experiments. An application to selecting genes in clustering spatial transcriptomics data is also discussed. Somabha Mukherjee, Sagnik Halder, Bhaswar B. Bhattacharya, George Michailidis |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |