Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daiki Kitashima

dblp:429/6343 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 70% Language models and text generation · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
automated negotiation
1.012026
Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
1.012026
Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › automated negotiation
multi-issue negotiation
1.012026
Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent reasoning
strategic reasoning
0.312026
Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tit-for-tat strategy · 1.0time-dependent strategy · 1.0large language model · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract)
abstract
Automated negotiation, a form of interaction among autonomous agents, plays a central role in multi-agent systems, yet the application of large language model (LLM) in this domain remains underexplored. An LLM can serve as a meta-strategist, adaptively selecting explicit strategies for execution by external strategic tools based on its capabilities. We propose a negotiation AI agent equipped with explicit strategic tools, including time-dependent and tit-for-tat negotiation strategies. Our results show that strategic tool enhanced negotiators achieve approximately 16% higher average utility compared with baseline, latest LLM negotiators.
Daiki Kitashima, Ryota Higa, Katsuhide Fujita
AAAI1