Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daiki Kitashima
dblp:429/6343
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 70% Language models and text generation · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
automated negotiation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › automated negotiation
multi-issue negotiation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent reasoning
strategic reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tit-for-tat strategy · 1.0time-dependent strategy · 1.0large language model · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Strategic Tool Enhanced AI Agent for Multi-Issue Negotiation (Student Abstract)abstractAutomated negotiation, a form of interaction among autonomous agents, plays a central role in multi-agent systems, yet the application of large language model (LLM) in this domain remains underexplored. An LLM can serve as a meta-strategist, adaptively selecting explicit strategies for execution by external strategic tools based on its capabilities. We propose a negotiation AI agent equipped with explicit strategic tools, including time-dependent and tit-for-tat negotiation strategies. Our results show that strategic tool enhanced negotiators achieve approximately 16% higher average utility compared with baseline, latest LLM negotiators. Daiki Kitashima, Ryota Higa, Katsuhide Fujita |
AAAI | 1 |