Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Purna Chandra Sekhar Vakudavathu

dblp:429/6685 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tool generation
1.012026
ToolSmith: A Multi-Agent Framework for Enterprise Tool Creation · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-agent framework · 2.0large language model · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ToolSmith: A Multi-Agent Framework for Enterprise Tool Creation
abstract
Although LLMs can generate tools for generic domains and tasks, they struggle with enterprise-related domains that involve proprietary APIs and data schemas. We present ToolSmith, a framework for autonomously generating and validating agent-compatible tools. Given an API specification and a Tool Specification Requirement (TSR), ToolSmith produces a tool function and verifies it through a closed-loop process: it creates natural language (NL) tests and executes the tool in a secure agent sandbox for validation. For state-changing tools, ToolSmith confirms outcomes by querying the API with parameters derived from the NL tests. If the tool fails to produce the desired output, ToolSmith generates diagnostic feedback to iteratively regenerate it. By ensuring both functional correctness and agent compatibility, ToolSmith enables reliable automation of enterprise workflows.
Purna Chandra Sekhar Vakudavathu, Kushal Mukherjee, Jayachandu Bandlamudi, Renuka Sindhgatta, Sameep Mehta
AAAI1