Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiuli Kang

dblp:429/7673 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 84% Multi-agent systems · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
multi-agent text generation
2.022026
DeepWriter: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework for Information-rich Ultra-long Book Writing · AAAI 2026
WikiMAG: A Multi-Agent Guided Framework for Generating Structured Wikipedia-like Articles · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
long-form text generation
1.012026
DeepWriter: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework for Information-rich Ultra-long Book Writing · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent collaboration
1.012026
WikiMAG: A Multi-Agent Guided Framework for Generating Structured Wikipedia-like Articles · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › structured generation
structured text generation
1.012026
WikiMAG: A Multi-Agent Guided Framework for Generating Structured Wikipedia-like Articles · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › long-form text generation
wikipedia article generation
1.012026
WikiMAG: A Multi-Agent Guided Framework for Generating Structured Wikipedia-like Articles · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.312026
DeepWriter: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework for Information-rich Ultra-long Book Writing · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 1.0multi-agent framework · 1.0multi-agent collaboration · 1.0LLM · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 WikiMAG: A Multi-Agent Guided Framework for Generating Structured Wikipedia-like Articles
abstract
Wikipedia serves as the world's largest and most popular online reference encyclopedia, rich in structured knowledge and authoritative citations. Recently, numerous works have leveraged large language models to automatically generate Wikipedia-like articles. However, existing approaches primarily focus on producing singular narrative-type content, overlooking higher information-density structured elements such as timeline and table. To address these limitations, we propose WikiMAG, a multi-agent guided framework for generating structured Wikipedia-like articles. This framework employs a collaborative multi-agent mechanism to orchestrate the creation process, featuring three synergistic core components: Progressive planner first constructs the coarse-grained outline framework and then annotate fine-grained types for outline units, encompassing narrative, timeline, and table formats; Reflective inspector dynamically curates high-quality references via multi-round interactive feedback, thereby enhancing the authority and relevance of citations; Versatile writer integrates fine-grained outline details and high-quality reference information to generate information-rich articles, incorporating the three annotated formats. We evaluate WikiMAG on two public datasets, FreshWiki and WikiGenBen, across outline, writing, and verifiability dimensions. Compared with the best baseline method, our method achieves an average improvement of 6.73 points and 4.39 points in Heading Soft Recall and the METEOR metric (a machine translation and text generation evaluation metric) respectively, and an average increase of 16.84 percentage points in Citation Rate.
Xiuli Kang, Yinlong Xiao, Minghao Hu 0001, Bin Mao, Fang Wang 0011, Zhunchen Luo, Guotong Geng
AAAI1
2026 DeepWriter: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework for Information-rich Ultra-long Book Writing
abstract
Long-form books are among the most information-rich and structurally complex forms of written content, often exceeding 100,000 words. While recent methods have enabled basic long-text generation, they remain limited in two key aspects: the inability to generate ultra-long content at book scale, and the lack of mechanisms for integrating rich factual information. To address these limitations, we propose DeepWriter, a multi-agent collaborative framework that follows a structured planning-then-generation paradigm. It first constructs a detailed book outline with narrative arcs and chapter semantics, then incrementally generates content conditioned on retrieved knowledge and contextual signals. DeepWriter supports controllable generation of full-length books exceeding 100,000 words, enriched with citations, trivia and images. To support evaluation beyond surface-level fluency, we introduce DeepWriter-Bench, a bilingual benchmark of 18 annotated books designed to assess book-scale coherence, richness, and factual grounding. Additionally, we propose BookScore, a unified 100-point metric for quantifying book maturity. Experimental results show that DeepWriter achieves a state-of-the-art BookScore of 80.92, consistently outperforming strong baselines.
Xiuli Kang, Chunming Liu, Zhunchen Luo, Guotong Geng
AAAI3