Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Skyler Cheung
dblp:429/9736
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Segmentation and scene understanding · 33% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document understanding
document layout analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LaTeX2Layout: High-Fidelity, Scalable Document Layout Annotation Pipeline for Layout Detection · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
document understanding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LaTeX2Layout: High-Fidelity, Scalable Document Layout Annotation Pipeline for Layout Detection · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 1.0latex compilation tracing · 1.0curriculum learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | LaTeX2Layout: High-Fidelity, Scalable Document Layout Annotation Pipeline for Layout DetectionabstractGeneral-purpose Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly integral to modern AI systems for document understanding, yet their ability to perform fine-grained layout analysis remains severely underdeveloped. Overcoming this limitation requires large-scale, high-fidelity training datasets. However, current annotation methods that rely on parsing rendered PDFs are costly, error-prone, and difficult to scale. We propose a different paradigm: extracting ground-truth layout directly from the LaTeX compilation process rather than the final PDF. We present LaTeX2Layout, a generalizable procedural pipeline that recovers pixel-accurate bounding boxes and reading order from compiler traces. This enables the generation of a 140K-page dataset, including 120K programmatically generated synthetic variants that more than double the layout diversity of real-world data. Using this dataset, we fine-tune an efficient 3B-parameter VLM with an easy-to-hard curriculum that accelerates convergence. Our model achieves Kendall's tau=0.95 for reading order and mAP@50=0.91 for element grounding, delivering nearly 200% relative improvement over strong zero-shot baselines such as GPT-4o and Claude-3.7. Feijiang Han, Skyler Cheung, Delip Rao, Chris Callison-Burch, Lyle H. Ungar |
AAAI | 5 |