Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Skyler Cheung

dblp:429/9736 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Segmentation and scene understanding · 33%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document understanding
document layout analysis
1.012026
LaTeX2Layout: High-Fidelity, Scalable Document Layout Annotation Pipeline for Layout Detection · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
document understanding
1.012026
LaTeX2Layout: High-Fidelity, Scalable Document Layout Annotation Pipeline for Layout Detection · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 1.0latex compilation tracing · 1.0curriculum learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LaTeX2Layout: High-Fidelity, Scalable Document Layout Annotation Pipeline for Layout Detection
abstract
General-purpose Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly integral to modern AI systems for document understanding, yet their ability to perform fine-grained layout analysis remains severely underdeveloped. Overcoming this limitation requires large-scale, high-fidelity training datasets. However, current annotation methods that rely on parsing rendered PDFs are costly, error-prone, and difficult to scale. We propose a different paradigm: extracting ground-truth layout directly from the LaTeX compilation process rather than the final PDF. We present LaTeX2Layout, a generalizable procedural pipeline that recovers pixel-accurate bounding boxes and reading order from compiler traces. This enables the generation of a 140K-page dataset, including 120K programmatically generated synthetic variants that more than double the layout diversity of real-world data. Using this dataset, we fine-tune an efficient 3B-parameter VLM with an easy-to-hard curriculum that accelerates convergence. Our model achieves Kendall's tau=0.95 for reading order and mAP@50=0.91 for element grounding, delivering nearly 200% relative improvement over strong zero-shot baselines such as GPT-4o and Claude-3.7.
Feijiang Han, Skyler Cheung, Delip Rao, Chris Callison-Burch, Lyle H. Ungar
AAAI5