Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tristan Newby

dblp:43/10075 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › multilevel security
bell-lapadula enforcement
0.112011
PRISM: Program Replication and Integration for Seamless MILS · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2011
Systems and software security
multilevel security
0.112011
PRISM: Program Replication and Integration for Seamless MILS · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2011
Systems and software security
operating system security
0.112011
PRISM: Program Replication and Integration for Seamless MILS · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2011
Systems and software security › trusted computing
trusted computing base
0.112011
PRISM: Program Replication and Integration for Seamless MILS · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polyinstantiation · 0.2diff transactions · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 SAFER PATH: Security architecture using fragmented execution and replication for protection against trojaned hardware
abstract
Ensuring electronic components are free from Hardware Trojans is a very difficult task. Research suggests that even the best pre- and post-deployment detection mechanisms will not discover all malicious inclusions, nor prevent them from being activated. For economic reasons electronic components are used regardless of the possible presence of such Trojans. We developed the SAFER PATH architecture, which uses instruction and data fragmentation, program replication, and voting to create a computational system that is able to operate safely in the presence of active Hardware Trojans. We protect the integrity of the computation, the confidentiality of data being processed and ensure system availability. By combining a small Trusted Computing Base with Commercial-Off-The-Shelf processing elements, we are able to protect computation from the effects of arbitrary Hardware Trojans.
Mark R. Beaumont, Bradley D. Hopkins, Tristan Newby
DATE3
2011 PRISM: Program Replication and Integration for Seamless MILS
abstract
We describe how to combine a minimal Trusted Computing Base (TCB) with polyinstantiated and slightly augmented Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) software programs in separate Single Level Secure (SLS) partitions to create MultiLevel Secure (MLS) applications. These MLS applications can coordinate fine grained (intra-document) Bell LaPadula (BLP) [6] separation between information at multiple security levels. The untrusted COTS programs in the SLS partitions send at-level file edits as diff transactions to the TCB. The TCB verifies that BLP semantics will be observed and then patches these transactions into its canonical representation of the file. Finally, it releases appropriately filtered versions back to each SLS partition for re-assembly into the COTS program's standard file format. Furthermore, by judiciously restricting how the user can interact with the system the multiple SLS instantiations of the COTS program can be made to appear as if they are a single MLS instantiation. We demonstrate the utility of this approach using Microsoft Word and DokuWiki.
Chris A. Owen, Duncan A. Grove, Tristan Newby, Alex Murray, Chris North 0002, Michael Pope
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy3