Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Lin Hai

dblp:43/10884 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
context compression
1.012026
GMSA: Enhancing Context Compression via Group Merging and Layer Semantic Alignment · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

layer semantic alignment · 1.0group merging · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 GMSA: Enhancing Context Compression via Group Merging and Layer Semantic Alignment
abstract
Jiwei Tang, Zhicheng Zhang, Shunlong Wu, Jingheng Ye, Lichen Bai, Zitai Wang, Tingwei Lu, Lin Hai, Yiming Zhao, Hai-Tao Zheng, Hong-Gee Kim. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Jiwei Tang, Zhicheng Zhang 0008, Shunlong Wu, Jingheng Ye, Lichen Bai, Zitai Wang, Tingwei Lu, Lin Hai, Hai-Tao Zheng 0002, Hong-Gee Kim
ACL (1)8
2025 Eliminating Retrieval Knowledge Conflicts: Cross-Validation Re-ranking with Large Language Models
abstract
In retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be effective for re-ranking. However, existing research often prioritizes passage relevance over reliability, which can result in the incorporation of conflicting information and the generation of ambiguous responses. This issue becomes particularly pronounced when addressing inter-context knowledge conflicts, where candidate documents present contradictory information that may mislead the model. To mitigate this problem, we propose a novel cross-validation re-ranking technique designed specifically to resolve inter-context knowledge conflicts during the retrieval process. We also develop a new dataset, ContraPRT, to evaluate the ability of models to rank passages containing conflicting knowledge. Experimental results using GPT-4 and LlaMA3-70B demonstrate that our approach not only effectively filters out conflicting information but also ensures accurate passage rankings, thereby providing reliable supplementary knowledge for the generation module.
Qirui Wu, Lin Hai, Hai-Tao Zheng 0002, Ruobing Xie, Saiyong Yang, Xingwu Sun, Zhanhui Kang, Hong-Gee Kim
IJCNN2