Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dan Tecuci

dblp:43/1489 · also Dan G. Tecuci · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 44% Language models and text generation · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 11%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
learning by reading
0.112007
Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned · AAAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base construction
0.012007
Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned · AAAI 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trainable extraction pipeline · 0.4natural language processing · 0.4question answering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The Design of an LLM-powered Unstructured Analytics System
Eric Anderson 0003, Jonathan Fritz, Austin Lee, Bohou Li, Mark Lindblad, Henry Lindeman, Alex Meyer, Parth Parmar, Tanvi Ranade, Mehul A. Shah, Ben Sowell, Dan Tecuci, Vinayak Thapliyal, Matt Welsh
CIDR12
2022 DI-2022: The Third Document Intelligence Workshop
abstract
Business documents are central to the operation of all organizations, and they come in all shapes and sizes: project reports, planning documents, technical specifications, financial statements, meeting minutes, legal agreements, contracts, resumes, purchase orders, invoices, and many more. The ability to read, understand and interpret these documents, referred to here as Document Intelligence (DI), is challenging due to not only many domains of knowledge involved, but also their complex formats and structures, internal and external cross references deployed, and even less-than-ideal quality of scans and OCR oftentimes performed on them. This workshop aims to explore and advance the current state of research and practice in answering these challenges.
Ani Nenkova, Douglas Burdick, Benjamin Han, Dave Lewis 0003, Sandeep Tata, Dan Tecuci
KDD6
2020 DICR: AI Assisted, Adaptive Platform for Contract Review
abstract
In the regular course of business, companies spend a lot of effort reading and interpreting documents, a highly manual process that involves tedious tasks, such as identifying dates and names or locating the presence or absence of certain clauses in a contract. Dealing with natural language is complex and further complicated by the fact that these documents come in various formats (scanned image, digital formats) and have different degrees of internal structure (spreadsheets, invoices, text documents). We present DICR, an end-to-end, modular, and trainable system that automates the mundane aspects of document review and allows humans to perform the validation. The system is able to speed up this work while increasing quality of information extracted, consistency, throughput, and decreasing time to decision. Extracted data can be fed into other downstream applications (from dashboards to Q&A and to report generation).
Dan Tecuci, Ravi Palla, Hamid R. Motahari Nezhad, Nishchal Ahuja, Alex Monteiro, Tigran Ishkhanov, Nigel P. Duffy
AAAI1
2013 USI Answers: Natural Language Question Answering Over (Semi-) Structured Industry Data
abstract
This paper describes USI Answers a natural language question answering system for semi-structured industry data. The paper reports on the progress towards the goal of offering easy access to enterprise data to a large number of business users, most of whom are not familiar with the specific syntax or semantics of the underlying data sources. Additional complications come from the nature of the data, which comes both as structured and unstructured. The proposed solution allows users to express questions in natural language, makes apparent the system’s interpretation of the query, and allows easy query adjustment and reformulation. The application is in use by more than 1500 users from Siemens Energy. We evaluate our approach on a data set consisting of fleet data.
Ulli Waltinger, Dan Tecuci, Mihaela Olteanu, Vlad Mocanu, Sean Sullivan
IAAI2
2013 Market Intelligence: Linked Data-driven Entity Resolution for Customer and Competitor Analysis
Ulli Waltinger, Dan Tecuci, Florin Picioroaga, Cosmin Grigoras, Sean Sullivan
ICWE2
2009 A Scalable Problem-Solver for Large Knowledge-Bases
abstract
We describe a problem solver built to answer questions like those on advanced placement exams using knowledge bases authored by domain experts. The problem solver is designed to work independently of any particular knowledge base or domain. Given a question, the problem solver identifies those portions of the knowledge base that are relevant to the question. We found that simple heuristics for judging relevance significantly improved performance, with no drop in coverage.
Shaw Yi Chaw, Ken Barker 0002, Bruce W. Porter, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh
ICTAI4
2007 Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned
Ken Barker 0002, Bhalchandra Agashe, Shaw Yi Chaw, James Fan, Noah S. Friedland, Michael R. Glass, Jerry R. Hobbs, Eduard H. Hovy, David J. Israel, Doo Soon Kim, Rutu Mulkar-Mehta, Sourabh Patwardhan, Bruce W. Porter, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh
AAAI14
2007 Capturing a taxonomy of failures during automatic interpretation of questions posed in natural language
abstract
An important problem in artificial intelligence is capturing, from natural language, formal representationsallthat can be used by a reasoner to compute an answer. Many researchers have studied this problem by developing algorithms addressing specific phenomena in natural language interpretation, but few have studied (or cataloged) the types of failures associated with this problem. Knowledgeallof these failures can help researchers by providing a roadallmap of open research problems and help practitioners by providing a checklist of issues to address in order to build systems that can achieve good performance on this problem.allIn this paper, we present a study -- conducted in the context of the Halo Project -- cataloging the types of failures that occur when capturing knowledge from naturallanguage. We identified the categories of failures by examining a corpus of questions posed byallnaive usersallto a knowledge based question answering system and empirically demonstrated the generality of ourallcategorizations. We also describe available technologies that can address some of the failures we have identified.
Peter Z. Yeh, Shaw Yi Chaw, James Fan, Dan Tecuci
K-CAP4
2004 A Question-Answering System for AP Chemistry: Assessing KR&R Technologies
Ken Barker 0002, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Shaw Yi Chaw, Peter Clark, James Fan, David J. Israel, Sunil Mishra, Bruce W. Porter, Pedro Romero, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh
KR10