Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Randy Wang

dblp:43/1873 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Distributed systems · 78% Cloud and datacenter computing · 22%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%
Computer networks
2 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 67% Routing and switching · 33%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.322018
Service fabric: a distributed platform for building microservices in the cloud · EuroSys 2018
Highly Secure and Efficient Routing · INFOCOM 2004
Services computing and microservices
microservice architecture
0.312018
Service fabric: a distributed platform for building microservices in the cloud · EuroSys 2018
Distributed systems › consistency models
distributed consistency
0.312018
Service fabric: a distributed platform for building microservices in the cloud · EuroSys 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud platform
0.112018
Service fabric: a distributed platform for building microservices in the cloud · EuroSys 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud platform
production cloud systems
0.112018
Service fabric: a distributed platform for building microservices in the cloud · EuroSys 2018
Internet architecture and protocols › overlay networks
overlay mesh
0.012004
Overlay Mesh Construction Using Interleaved Spanning Trees · INFOCOM 2004
Internet architecture and protocols
overlay networks
0.012004
Overlay Mesh Construction Using Interleaved Spanning Trees · INFOCOM 2004
Routing and switching › routing
secure routing
0.012004
Highly Secure and Efficient Routing · INFOCOM 2004
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
0.012004
Highly Secure and Efficient Routing · INFOCOM 2004
Network security › routing security
malicious router detection
0.012004
Highly Secure and Efficient Routing · INFOCOM 2004
Graph algorithms and graph theory › spanning tree
minimum spanning tree
0.012004
Overlay Mesh Construction Using Interleaved Spanning Trees · INFOCOM 2004
Graph algorithms and graph theory
spanning tree
0.012004
Overlay Mesh Construction Using Interleaved Spanning Trees · INFOCOM 2004
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
byzantine fault tolerance
0.012004
Highly Secure and Efficient Routing · INFOCOM 2004
Distributed systems
distributed algorithms
0.012004
Overlay Mesh Construction Using Interleaved Spanning Trees · INFOCOM 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault tolerance · 0.7distributed coordination · 0.7simulation · 0.1planetlab implementation · 0.1fault detection protocols · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Service fabric: a distributed platform for building microservices in the cloud
abstract
We describe Service Fabric (SF), Microsoft's distributed platform for building, running, and maintaining microservice applications in the cloud. SF has been running in production for 10+ years, powering many critical services at Microsoft. This paper outlines key design philosophies in SF. We then adopt a bottom-up approach to describe low-level components in its architecture, focusing on modular use and support for strong semantics like fault-tolerance and consistency within each component of SF. We discuss lessons learned, and present experimental results from production data.
Gopal Kakivaya, Lu Xun, Richard Hasha, Shegufta Bakht Ahsan, Todd Pfleiger, Rishi Sinha, Mihail Tarta, Mark Fussell, Vipul Modi, Mansoor Mohsin, Ray Kong, Anmol Ahuja, Oana Platon, Alex Wun, Matthew Snider, Chacko Daniel, Dan Mastrian, Aprameya Rao, Vaishnav Kidambi, Randy Wang, Abhishek Ram, Sumukh Shivaprakash, Rajeet Nair, Alan Warwick, Bharat S. Narasimman, Jeffrey Chen, Abhay Balkrishna Mhatre, Preetha Subbarayalu, Mert Coskun, Indranil Gupta
EuroSys22
2004 Highly Secure and Efficient Routing
abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of routing in an adversarial environment, where a sophisticated adversary has penetrated arbitrary parts of the routing infrastructure and attempts to disrupt routing. We present protocols that are able to route packets as long as at least one nonfaulty path exists between the source and the destination. These protocols have low communication overhead, low processing requirements, low incremental cost, and fast fault detection. We also present extensions to the protocols that penalize adversarial routers by blocking their traffic.
Ioannis C. Avramopoulos, Hisashi Kobayashi, Randy Wang, Arvind Krishnamurthy
INFOCOM3
2004 Overlay Mesh Construction Using Interleaved Spanning Trees
abstract
In this paper we evaluate a method of using interleaved spanning trees to compose a resilient, high performance overlay mesh. Though spanning trees of arbitrary type could be used to construct an overlay mesh, we focus on a distributed algorithm that computes k minimum spanning trees on an arbitrary graph. The principal motivation behind this strategy is to provide applications with a k-redundant, high quality mesh suitable for demanding applications like A/V broadcast, video conferencing, data collection, multi-path routing, and file mirroring/transfer. We elaborate details of k-MST, pointing out advantages and potential problem points of the protocol, and then analyze its performance using a variety of metrics with simulation as well as a functional PlanetLab implementation.
Anthony Young, Arvind Krishnamurthy, Larry L. Peterson, Randy Wang
INFOCOM6