Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naimul Basher

dblp:43/2347 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 75% Network performance modeling · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics › traffic analysis
peer-to-peer traffic analysis
0.112008
A comparative analysis of web and peer-to-peer traffic · WWW 2008
Network measurement and analytics
traffic characterization
0.112008
A comparative analysis of web and peer-to-peer traffic · WWW 2008
Network measurement and analytics › traffic analysis
web traffic analysis
0.112008
A comparative analysis of web and peer-to-peer traffic · WWW 2008
Network performance modeling
workload modeling
0.112008
A comparative analysis of web and peer-to-peer traffic · WWW 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace analysis · 0.1distribution fitting · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 A comparative analysis of web and peer-to-peer traffic
abstract
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) applications continue to grow in popularity, and have reportedly overtaken Web applications as the single largest contributor to Internet traffic. Using traces collected from a large edge network, we conduct an extensive analysis of P2P traffic, compare P2P traffic with Web traffic, and discuss the implications of increased P2P traffic. In addition to studying the aggregate P2P traffic, we also analyze and compare the two main constituents of P2P traffic in our data, namely BitTorrent and Gnutella. The results presented in the paper may be used for generating synthetic workloads, gaining insights into the functioning of P2P applications, and developing network management strategies. For example, our results suggest that new models are necessary for Internet traffic. As a first step, we present flow-level distributional models for Web and P2P traffic that may be used in network simulation and emulation experiments.
Naimul Basher, Aniket Mahanti, Anirban Mahanti, Carey L. Williamson, Martin F. Arlitt
WWW1