Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carlo Mannino

dblp:43/2973 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-2974-9165ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Computer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 67% Computational geometry · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
0.011998
Optimal Upward Planarity Testing of Single-Source Digraphs · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Computational geometry
graph drawing
0.011998
Optimal Upward Planarity Testing of Single-Source Digraphs · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Graph algorithms and graph theory › planar graphs
planarity testing
0.011998
Optimal Upward Planarity Testing of Single-Source Digraphs · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › PRAM algorithms
CRCW PRAM
0.011998
Optimal Upward Planarity Testing of Single-Source Digraphs · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms
0.011998
Optimal Upward Planarity Testing of Single-Source Digraphs · SIAM J. Comput. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel algorithm · 0.0combinatorial characterization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 MILP approaches to practical real-time train scheduling: the Iron Ore Line case
Lukas Bach, Carlo Mannino, Giorgio Sartor
INOC2
2018 The Path&Cycle Formulation for the Hotspot Problem in Air Traffic Management
abstract
The Hotspot Problem in Air Traffic Management consists of optimally rescheduling a set of airplanes that are forecast to occupy an overcrowded region of the airspace, should they follow their original schedule. We first provide a MILP model for the Hotspot Problem using a standard big-M formulation. Then, we present a novel MILP model that gets rid of the big-M coefficients. The new formulation contains only simple combinatorial constraints, corresponding to paths and cycles in an associated disjunctive graph. We report computational results on a set of randomly generated instances. In the experiments, the new formulation consistently outperforms the big-M formulation, both in terms of running times and number of branching nodes.
Carlo Mannino, Giorgio Sartor
ATMOS1
2016 A New Modelling Approach Is Required to Help Mobile Network Operators Handle the Growing Demand for Data Traffic
Leonardo Lamorgese, Tomas Eric Nordlander, Carlo Mannino
ICORES3
2013 The dispatching problem on multitrack territories: Heuristic approaches based on mixed integer linear programming
abstract
Abstract Trains running through railway lines often accumulate some delay. When this happens, rescheduling and rerouting decisions must be quickly taken in real time. Despite the fact that even a single wrong decision may deteriorate the performance of the whole railway network, this complex optimization task is still basically performed by human operators. In very recent years, the interest of train operators to implement automated decision systems has grown. Not incidentally, the railway application section (RAS) of INFORMS has issued a challenge devoted to this problem concomitantly with the INFORMS Annual Meeting 2012. In this article, we describe two heuristic approaches to solve the RAS problem based on a mixed integer linear programming formulation, and we report computational results on the three RAS instances and on an additional set of instances defined on a more congested network. Computational results on the challenge test bed show that our algorithms positively compare with other approaches to the RAS problem. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 62(4), 315–326 2013
Maurizio Boccia, Carlo Mannino, Igor Vasil'ev
Networks2
2011 Negative Cycle Separation in Wireless Network Design
Fabio D'Andreagiovanni, Carlo Mannino, Antonio Sassano
INOC2
2008 Time offset optimization in digital broadcasting
Carlo Mannino, Fabrizio Rossi, Antonio Sassano, Stefano Smriglio
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2005 On the cubicity of certain graphs
L. Sunil Chandran, Carlo Mannino, Gianpaolo Oriolo
Inf. Process. Lett.2
2003 An Enumerative Algorithm for the Frequency Assignment Problem
Carlo Mannino, Antonio Sassano
Discret. Appl. Math.1
1998 Optimal Upward Planarity Testing of Single-Source Digraphs
abstract
A digraph is upward planar if it has a planar drawing such that all the edges are monotone with respect to the vertical direction. Testing upward planarity and constructing upward planar drawings is important for displaying hierarchical network structures, which frequently arise in software engineering, project management, and visual languages. In this paper we investigate upward planarity testing of single-source digraphs; we provide a new combinatorial characterization of upward planarity and give an optimal algorithm for upward planarity testing. Our algorithm tests whether a single-source digraph with n vertices is upward planar in O(n) sequential time, and in O(log n) time on a CRCW PRAM with $n \log \log n/\log n$ processors, using O(n,) space. The algorithm also constructs an upward planar drawing if the test is successful. The previously known best result is an O(n 2 )-time algorithm by Hutton and Lubiw [Proc. 2nd ACM--SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1991, pp. 203--211]. No efficient parallel algorithms for upward planarity testing were previously known.
Paola Bertolazzi, Giuseppe Di Battista, Carlo Mannino, Roberto Tamassia
SIAM J. Comput.3
1994 Upward Drawings of Triconnected Digraphs
Paola Bertolazzi, Giuseppe Di Battista, Giuseppe Liotta, Carlo Mannino
Algorithmica4
1993 Optimal Upward Planarity Testing of Single-Source Digraphs
Paola Bertolazzi, Giuseppe Di Battista, Carlo Mannino, Roberto Tamassia
ESA3