Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dan Yang 0004
dblp:43/3014-4
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-0069-3893ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 57% Motion planning and robot control · 21% Information extraction and text analysis · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 38% Knowledge graphs · 36% Graph data management · 27% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PRGB Benchmark: A Robust Placeholder-Assisted Algorithm for Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation · AAAI 2026 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | WebClipper: Efficient Evolution of Web Agents with Graph-based Trajectory Pruning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
web agents |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | WebClipper: Efficient Evolution of Web Agents with Graph-based Trajectory Pruning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effectively PAIRing LLMs with Online Marketing via Progressive Prompting Augmentation · ICDE 2025 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effectively PAIRing LLMs with Online Marketing via Progressive Prompting Augmentation · ICDE 2025 |
Graph data management › graph data model
entity graph |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Who Would be Interested in Services? An Entity Graph Learning System for User Targeting · ICDE 2023 |
Information retrieval › online advertising
user targeting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Who Would be Interested in Services? An Entity Graph Learning System for User Targeting · ICDE 2023 |
Information retrieval › online advertising
audience targeting |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Effectively PAIRing LLMs with Online Marketing via Progressive Prompting Augmentation · ICDE 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
model distillation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Know Your Needs Better: Towards Structured Understanding of Marketer Demands with Analogical Reasoning Augmented LLMs · KDD 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
progressive prompting augmentation · 1.7large language model prompting · 1.7knowledge distillation · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7web agents · 1.0placeholder-based decoupling · 1.0graph-based trajectory pruning · 1.0retrieval-based analogical reasoning · 0.8multi-task model distillation · 0.8chain-of-thought prompting · 0.8relation mining · 0.7graph learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PRGB Benchmark: A Robust Placeholder-Assisted Algorithm for Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented GenerationabstractRetrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge, where the LLM's ability to generate responses based on the combination of a given query and retrieved documents is crucial. However, most benchmarks focus on overall RAG system performance, rarely assessing LLM-specific capabilities. Current benchmarks emphasize broad aspects such as noise robustness, but lack a systematic and granular evaluation framework on document utilization. To this end, we introduce Placeholder-RAG-Benchmark, a multi-level fine-grained benchmark, emphasizing the following progressive dimensions: (1) multi-level filtering abilities, (2) combination abilities, and (3) reference reasoning. To provide a more nuanced understanding of LLMs' roles in RAG systems, we formulate an innovative placeholder-based approach to decouple the contributions of the LLM's parametric knowledge and the external knowledge. Experiments demonstrate the limitations of representative LLMs in the RAG system's generation capabilities, particularly in error resilience and context faithfulness. Our benchmark provides a reproducible framework for developing more reliable and efficient RAG systems. Zhehao Tan, Yihan Jiao, Dan Yang 0004, Duolin Sun, Jian Wang 0108, Jinjie Gu |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2026 | WebClipper: Efficient Evolution of Web Agents with Graph-based Trajectory PruningabstractJunjie Wang, Zequn Xie, Dan Yang, Jie Feng, Yue Shen, Duolin Sun, Meixiu Long, Yihan Jiao, Zhehao Tan, Jian Wang, Peng Wei, Jinjie Gu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Zequn Xie, Dan Yang 0004, Duolin Sun, Meixiu Long, Yihan Jiao, Zhehao Tan, Jian Wang 0108, Jinjie Gu |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | Effectively PAIRing LLMs with Online Marketing via Progressive Prompting AugmentationabstractIn this paper, we seek to carefully prompt a Large Language Model (LLM) with domain-level knowledge as a better marketing-oriented knowledge miner for marketing-oriented knowledge graph construction, which is non-trivial, suffering from several inevitable issues in real-world marketing scenarios, i.e., uncontrollable relation generation of LLMs, insufficient prompting ability of a single prompt, unaffordable deployment cost of LLMs. To this end, we propose PAIR, a novel Progressive prompting Augmented mIning fRamework for harvesting marketing-oriented knowledge graph with LLMs. In particular, we reduce the pure relation generation to an LLM-based adaptive relation filtering process through knowledge-empowered prompting technique. Next, we steer LLMs for entity expansion with progressive prompting augmentation, followed by a reliable aggregation with comprehensive consideration of both self-consistency and semantic relatedness. In terms of online serving, we specialize in a small and white-box PAIR (i.e., LightPAIR), which is fine-tuned with a high-quality corpus provided by a strong teacher-LLM. Extensive experiments and practical applications in audience targeting verify the effectiveness of the proposed (Light)PAIR. Chunjing Gan, Dan Yang 0004, Binbin Hu, Zhiqiang Zhang 0012, Jinjie Gu, Jun Zhou 0011 |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2024 | Know Your Needs Better: Towards Structured Understanding of Marketer Demands with Analogical Reasoning Augmented LLMsabstractIn this paper, we explore a new way for user targeting, where non-expert marketers could select their target users solely given demands in natural language form. The key to this issue is how to transform natural languages into practical structured logical languages, i.e., the structured understanding of marketer demands. In practical scenarios, the demands of non-expert marketers are often abstract and diverse. Considering the impressive natural language processing ability of large language models (LLMs), we try to leverage LLMs to solve this issue. To stimulate the LLMs' reasoning ability, the chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting method is widely used, but existing methods still have some limitations in our scenario: (1) Previous methods either use simple "Let's think step by step" spells or provide fixed examples in demonstrations without considering compatibility between prompts and concrete questions, making LLMs ineffective when the marketers' demands are abstract and diverse. (2) Previous methods are often implemented in closed-source models or excessively large models, which is not suitable in industrial practical scenarios. Based on these, we propose ARALLM (i.e., Analogical Reasoning Augmented Large Language Models) consisting of two modules: Analogical Reasoning based Prompting and Reasoning-Augmented Multi-Task Model Distillation. Then, we adopt a retrieval-based method to conduct analogical reasoning with the help of the reasoning library. The experimental results show that this prompting strategy achieves better performance than the ordinary prompting method. Beyond that, we distill knowledge from super LLMs (GPT-3.5) to fine-tune smaller student LLMs in a multi-task training paradigm, enabling the models to be easily deployed in practical environments. Part of our data and code can be found at https://github.com/alipay/Analogic-Reasoning-Augmented-Large-Language-Model. Dan Yang 0004, Binbin Hu, Wen Zhang 0015, Jinjie Gu |
KDD | 2 |
| 2023 | Who Would be Interested in Services? An Entity Graph Learning System for User TargetingabstractWith the growing popularity of various mobile devices, user targeting has received a growing amount of attention, which aims at effectively and efficiently locating target users that are interested in specific services. Most pioneering works for user targeting tasks commonly perform similarity-based expansion with a few active users as seeds, suffering from the following major issues: the unavailability of seed users for new-coming services and the unfriendliness of black-box procedures towards marketers. In this paper, we design an Entity Graph Learning (EGL) system to provide explainable user targeting ability meanwhile applicable to addressing the cold-start issue. EGL System follows the hybrid online-offline architecture to satisfy the requirements of scalability and timeliness. Specifically, in the offline stage, the system focuses on the heavyweight entity graph construction and user entity preference learning, in which we propose a Three-stage Relation Mining Procedure (TRMP), breaking loose from the expensive seed users. At the online stage, the system offers the ability of user targeting in real-time based on the entity graph from the offline stage. Since the user targeting process is based on graph reasoning, the whole process is transparent and operation-friendly to marketers. Finally, extensive offline experiments and online A/B testing demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed EGL System. Dan Yang 0004, Binbin Hu, Zhiqiang Zhang 0012, Jinjie Gu |
ICDE | 1 |