Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Huiling Le

dblp:43/3168 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 93% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.422014
2D Affine and Projective Shape Analysis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Parallel Transport of Deformations in Shape Space of Elastic Surfaces · ICCV 2013
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis › statistical shape analysis
riemannian shape analysis
0.212014
2D Affine and Projective Shape Analysis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis
statistical shape analysis
0.212013
Parallel Transport of Deformations in Shape Space of Elastic Surfaces · ICCV 2013
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
activity recognition
0.112014
2D Affine and Projective Shape Analysis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

path-straightening algorithm · 0.2gaussian-type statistical models · 0.2square-root normal fields · 0.2riemannian geometry · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 2D Affine and Projective Shape Analysis
abstract
Current techniques for shape analysis tend to seek invariance to similarity transformations (rotation, translation, and scale), but certain imaging situations require invariance to larger groups, such as affine or projective groups. Here we present a general Riemannian framework for shape analysis of planar objects where metrics and related quantities are invariant to affine and projective groups. Highlighting two possibilities for representing object boundaries-ordered points (or landmarks) and parameterized curves-we study different combinations of these representations (points and curves) and transformations (affine and projective). Specifically, we provide solutions to three out of four situations and develop algorithms for computing geodesics and intrinsic sample statistics, leading up to Gaussian-type statistical models, and classifying test shapes using such models learned from training data. In the case of parameterized curves, we also achieve the desired goal of invariance to re-parameterizations. The geodesics are constructed by particularizing the path-straightening algorithm to geometries of current manifolds and are used, in turn, to compute shape statistics and Gaussian-type shape models. We demonstrate these ideas using a number of examples from shape and activity recognition.
Darshan W. Bryner, Eric Klassen, Huiling Le, Anuj Srivastava
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2013 Parallel Transport of Deformations in Shape Space of Elastic Surfaces
abstract
Statistical shape analysis develops methods for comparisons, deformations, summarizations, and modeling of shapes in given data sets. These tasks require a fundamental tool called parallel transport of tangent vectors along arbitrary paths. This tool is essential for: (1) computation of geodesic paths using either shooting or path-straightening method, (2) transferring deformations across objects, and (3) modeling of statistical variability in shapes. Using the square-root normal field (SRNF) representation of parameterized surfaces, we present a method for transporting deformations along paths in the shape space. This is difficult despite the underlying space being a vector space because the chosen (elastic) Riemannian metric is non-standard. Using a finite-basis for representing SRNFs of shapes, we derive expressions for Christoffel symbols that enable parallel transports. We demonstrate this framework using examples from shape analysis of parameterized spherical surfaces, in the three contexts mentioned above.
Qian Xie 0003, Sebastian Kurtek, Huiling Le, Anuj Srivastava
ICCV3
2012 Fitting smoothing splines to time-indexed, noisy points on nonlinear manifolds
Jingyong Su, Ian L. Dryden, Eric Klassen, Huiling Le, Anuj Srivastava
Image Vis. Comput.4
2002 The statistical analysis of dynamic curves and sections
Christopher G. Small, Huiling Le
Pattern Recognit.2
1999 Multidimensional scaling of simplex shapes
Huiling Le, Christopher G. Small
Pattern Recognit.1