Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brad Whitlock
dblp:43/3214
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6261-7522ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 87% Performance modeling and evaluation · 13% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing › spatial data structures
bounding volume hierarchy |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Spatially Accelerated Winding Numbers for Curved Geometry · ACM Trans. Graph. 2026 |
Geometric modeling and processing › computational geometry
containment queries |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Spatially Accelerated Winding Numbers for Curved Geometry · ACM Trans. Graph. 2026 |
Geometric modeling and processing
winding number |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Spatially Accelerated Winding Numbers for Curved Geometry · ACM Trans. Graph. 2026 |
High-performance computing › scientific data analysis
in-situ analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructures · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing › scientific visualization
in situ visualization and analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructures · SC 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taylor expansion · 1.0generalized winding numbers · 1.0adaptive subdivision · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Spatially Accelerated Winding Numbers for Curved GeometryabstractThe generalized winding number (GWN) is a scalar field that supports robust containment queries on curved geometry, including non-watertight, overlapping, and nested boundary representations. While queries can be easily parallelized over samples, direct evaluation on parametric curves and surfaces remains costly for large and complex models. Fast, state-of-the-art GWN approaches leverage a spatial index to approximate the GWN, typically coupled with a Taylor expansion which approximates the GWN contribution for far clusters of geometric primitives. However, such methods operate only on discrete inputs such as triangle meshes and point clouds, and would introduce containment errors near boundaries if applied to curved input. We extend support for fast GWN evaluation over arbitrary collections of NURBS curves in 2D and trimmed NURBS patches in 3D via a Bounding Volume Hierarchy that stores efficiently precomputed moment data in the hierarchy nodes. When querying the hierarchy, approximations for far clusters are used alongside direct evaluation for nearby NURBS primitives, achieving sub-linear complexity while preserving the geometric features in the vicinity of the query point. Central to our performance improvements is an adaptive subdivision strategy for NURBS primitives during a preprocessing phase, creating better spatial partitions while retaining the same accuracy for containment decisions as a direct evaluation. We demonstrate the performance and accuracy of our approach across a large collection of 2D and 3D datasets. Jacob Spainhour, Brad Whitlock, Kenneth Weiss 0001 |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |
| 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructuresabstractA key trend facing extreme-scale computational science is the widening gap between computational and I/O rates, and the challenge that follows is how to best gain insight from simulation data when it is increasingly impractical to save it to persistent storage for subsequent visual exploration and analysis. One approach to this challenge is centered around the idea of in situ processing, where visualization and analysis processing is performed while data is still resident in memory. This paper examines several key design and performance issues related to the idea of in situ processing at extreme scale on modern platforms: scalability, overhead, performance measurement and analysis, comparison and contrast with a traditional post hoc approach, and interfacing with simulation codes. We illustrate these principles in practice with studies, conducted on large-scale HPC platforms, that include a miniapplication and multiple science application codes, one of which demonstrates in situ methods in use at greater than 1M-way concurrency. Utkarsh Ayachit, Andrew C. Bauer, Earl P. N. Duque, Greg Eisenhauer, Nicola J. Ferrier, Junmin Gu, Kenneth E. Jansen, Burlen Loring, Zarija Lukic, Suresh Menon, Dmitriy Morozov, Patrick O'Leary, Reetesh Ranjan, Michel E. Rasquin, Christopher P. Stone, Venkatram Vishwanath, Gunther H. Weber, Brad Whitlock, Matthew Wolf, Kesheng Wu, E. Wes Bethel |
SC | 18 |
| 2016 | In Situ Methods, Infrastructures, and Applications on High Performance Computing PlatformsabstractAbstract The considerable interest in the high performance computing (HPC) community regarding analyzing and visualization data without first writing to disk, i. e., in situ processing, is due to several factors. First is an I/O cost savings, where data is analyzed/visualized while being generated, without first storing to a filesystem. Second is the potential for increased accuracy, where fine temporal sampling of transient analysis might expose some complex behavior missed in coarse temporal sampling. Third is the ability to use all available resources, CPU's and accelerators, in the computation of analysis products. This STAR paper brings together researchers, developers and practitioners using in situ methods in extreme‐scale HPC with the goal to present existing methods, infrastructures, and a range of computational science and engineering applications using in situ analysis and visualization. Andrew C. Bauer, Hasan Abbasi, James P. Ahrens, Hank Childs, Berk Geveci, Scott Klasky, Kenneth Moreland, Patrick O'Leary, Venkatram Vishwanath, Brad Whitlock, E. Wes Bethel |
Comput. Graph. Forum | 10 |
| 2005 | A Contract Based System For Large Data VisualizationabstractVisIt is a richly featured visualization tool that is used to visualize some of the largest simulations ever run. The scale of these simulations requires that optimizations are incorporated into every operation VisIt performs. But the set of applicable optimizations that VisIt can perform is dependent on the types of operations being done. Complicating the issue, VisIt has a plugin capability that allows new, unforeseen components to be added, making it even harder to determine which optimizations can be applied. We introduce the concept of a contract to the standard data flow network design. This contract enables each component of the data flow network to modify the set of optimizations used. In addition, the contract allows for new components to be accommodated gracefully within VisIt's data flow network system. Hank Childs, Eric Brugger, Kathleen S. Bonnell, Jeremy S. Meredith, Mark C. Miller, Brad Whitlock, Nelson L. Max |
IEEE Visualization | 6 |