Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yiling Lu

dblp:43/3443 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3662-2106ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
7 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 91% Medical and health informatics · 9%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.612022
RPPA SPACE: an R package for normalization and quantitation of Reverse-Phase Protein Array data · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference
0.432013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2012
Bayesian Inference of Signaling Network Topology in a Cancer Cell Line · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › kinetic modeling
biochemical kinetics modeling
0.322013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
network inference
0.322013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network
network biology
0.312017
Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › network analysis
network clustering
0.312017
Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study · Bioinform. 2017
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
patient subgroup identification
0.312017
Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
high-throughput screening
0.212022
RPPA SPACE: an R package for normalization and quantitation of Reverse-Phase Protein Array data · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
protein quantification
0.212022
RPPA SPACE: an R package for normalization and quantitation of Reverse-Phase Protein Array data · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
signaling network inference
0.112012
Bayesian Inference of Signaling Network Topology in a Cancer Cell Line · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.012008
Bayesian models based on test statistics for multiple hypothesis testing problems · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

equilibrium analysis of chemical kinetics · 0.3high-dimensional statistics · 0.3logistic regression · 0.2generalized linear model · 0.2variable selection · 0.1empirical bayes · 0.1dynamic bayesian network · 0.1test statistic modeling · 0.1Bayesian FDR · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Asynchronous multi-agent based differential evolution for assembly hybrid differentiation flowshop scheduling with variable sub-lot and limited buffer
abstract
Lot-streaming enables a discrete supply of components to multiple assembled products, while the limited buffer controls the fluency of the production flow. Thus, integrating differentiation processing with assembly, this work addresses an assembly hybrid differentiation flowshop scheduling with variable sub-lot and limited buffer (AHDFSP-VS-LB). Focusing on makespan minimization, a mixed-integer linear programming model is established and an asynchronous multi-agent based differential evolution (AMDE) is developed. Constrained by the limited buffer capacity, the AMDE incorporates a deadlock pre-detection strategy to quickly identify infeasible solutions during encoding and a dynamic adjustment strategy to ensure a high-quality feasible solution during decoding. Further, derived from processing-assembly coordination and buffer constraint, four problem-specific properties are extracted and embedded into the initialization and improvement strategy to optimize the performance of the algorithm. To achieve fast and sufficient convergence of the algorithm, an asynchronous multi-agent cooperative learning mechanism is designed to dynamically control the evolution power and direction for each individual by identifying the critical encoding layer and its suitable parameters at different search phases. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the designed operators excel in efficiency and coordination, and the proposed algorithm is superior to five state-of-the-art algorithms in solving this new problem.
Yiling Lu, Qiuhua Tang
Adv. Eng. Informatics1
2022 RPPA SPACE: an R package for normalization and quantitation of Reverse-Phase Protein Array data
abstract
SUMMARY: Reverse-Phase Protein Array (RPPA) is a robust high-throughput, cost-effective platform for quantitatively measuring proteins in biological specimens. However, converting raw RPPA data into normalized, analysis-ready data remains a challenging task. Here, we present the RPPA SPACE (RPPA Superposition Analysis and Concentration Evaluation) R package, a substantially improved successor to SuperCurve, to meet that challenge. SuperCurve has been used to normalize over 170 000 samples to date. RPPA SPACE allows exclusion of poor-quality samples from the normalization process to improve the quality of the remaining samples. It also features a novel quality-control metric, 'noise', that estimates the level of random errors present in each RPPA slide. The noise metric can help to determine the quality and reliability of the data. In addition, RPPA SPACE has simpler input requirements and is more flexible than SuperCurve, it is much faster with greatly improved error reporting. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The standalone RPPA SPACE R package, tutorials and sample data are available via https://rppa.space/, CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RPPASPACE/index.html) and GitHub (https://github.com/MD-Anderson-Bioinformatics/RPPASPACE). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Huma Shehwana, Shwetha V. Kumar, James M. Melott, Mary A. Rohrdanz, Chris Wakefield, Zhenlin Ju, Doris R. Siwak, Yiling Lu, Bradley M. Broom, John N. Weinstein, Gordon B. Mills, Rehan Akbani
Bioinform.8
2017 Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study
abstract
MOTIVATION: Molecular pathways and networks play a key role in basic and disease biology. An emerging notion is that networks encoding patterns of molecular interplay may themselves differ between contexts, such as cell type, tissue or disease (sub)type. However, while statistical testing of differences in mean expression levels has been extensively studied, testing of network differences remains challenging. Furthermore, since network differences could provide important and biologically interpretable information to identify molecular subgroups, there is a need to consider the unsupervised task of learning subgroups and networks that define them. This is a nontrivial clustering problem, with neither subgroups nor subgroup-specific networks known at the outset. RESULTS: We leverage recent ideas from high-dimensional statistics for testing and clustering in the network biology setting. The methods we describe can be applied directly to most continuous molecular measurements and networks do not need to be specified beforehand. We illustrate the ideas and methods in a case study using protein data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). This provides evidence that patterns of interplay between signalling proteins differ significantly between cancer types. Furthermore, we show how the proposed approaches can be used to learn subtypes and the molecular networks that define them. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: As the Bioconductor package nethet. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Nicolas Städler, Frank Dondelinger, Steven M. Hill, Rehan Akbani, Yiling Lu, Gordon B. Mills, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.5
2015 Development of a robust classifier for quality control of reverse-phase protein arrays
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) technology allows for the parallel measurement of protein expression levels in approximately 1000 samples. However, the many steps required in the complex protocol (sample lysate preparation, slide printing, hybridization, washing and amplified detection) may create substantial variability in data quality. We are not aware of any other quality control algorithm that is tuned to the special characteristics of RPPAs. RESULTS: We have developed a novel classifier for quality control of RPPA experiments using a generalized linear model and logistic function. The outcome of the classifier, ranging from 0 to 1, is defined as the probability that a slide is of good quality. After training, we tested the classifier using two independent validation datasets. We conclude that the classifier can distinguish RPPA slides of good quality from those of poor quality sufficiently well such that normalization schemes, protein expression patterns and advanced biological analyses will not be drastically impacted by erroneous measurements or systematic variations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The classifier, implemented in the "SuperCurve" R package, can be freely downloaded at http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/main/OOMPA:Overview or http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/supercurve/. The data used to develop and validate the classifier are available at http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/MOAR.
Zhenlin Ju, Paul L. Roebuck, Doris R. Siwak, Nianxiang Zhang, Yiling Lu, Michael A. Davies, Rehan Akbani, John N. Weinstein, Gordon B. Mills, Kevin R. Coombes
Bioinform.6
2013 Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics
abstract
MOTIVATION: Network inference approaches are widely used to shed light on regulatory interplay between molecular players such as genes and proteins. Biochemical processes underlying networks of interest (e.g. gene regulatory or protein signalling networks) are generally nonlinear. In many settings, knowledge is available concerning relevant chemical kinetics. However, existing network inference methods for continuous, steady-state data are typically rooted in statistical formulations, which do not exploit chemical kinetics to guide inference. RESULTS: Herein, we present an approach to network inference for steady-state data that is rooted in non-linear descriptions of biochemical mechanism. We use equilibrium analysis of chemical kinetics to obtain functional forms that are in turn used to infer networks using steady-state data. The approach we propose is directly applicable to conventional steady-state gene expression or proteomic data and does not require knowledge of either network topology or any kinetic parameters. We illustrate the approach in the context of protein phosphorylation networks, using data simulated from a recent mechanistic model and proteomic data from cancer cell lines. In the former, the true network is known and used for assessment, whereas in the latter, results are compared against known biochemistry. We find that the proposed methodology is more effective at estimating network topology than methods based on linear models. AVAILABILITY: mukherjeelab.nki.nl/CODE/GK_Kinetics.zip CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Chris J. Oates, Bryan T. J. Hennessy, Yiling Lu, Gordon B. Mills, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.3
2012 Bayesian Inference of Signaling Network Topology in a Cancer Cell Line
abstract
MOTIVATION: Protein signaling networks play a key role in cellular function, and their dysregulation is central to many diseases, including cancer. To shed light on signaling network topology in specific contexts, such as cancer, requires interrogation of multiple proteins through time and statistical approaches to make inferences regarding network structure. RESULTS: In this study, we use dynamic Bayesian networks to make inferences regarding network structure and thereby generate testable hypotheses. We incorporate existing biology using informative network priors, weighted objectively by an empirical Bayes approach, and exploit a connection between variable selection and network inference to enable exact calculation of posterior probabilities of interest. The approach is computationally efficient and essentially free of user-set tuning parameters. Results on data where the true, underlying network is known place the approach favorably relative to existing approaches. We apply these methods to reverse-phase protein array time-course data from a breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-468) to predict signaling links that we independently validate using targeted inhibition. The methods proposed offer a general approach by which to elucidate molecular networks specific to biological context, including, but not limited to, human cancers. AVAILABILITY: http://mukherjeelab.nki.nl/DBN (code and data).
Steven M. Hill, Yiling Lu, Jennifer Molina, Laura Heiser, Paul T. Spellman, Terence P. Speed, Joe W. Gray, Gordon B. Mills, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.2
2012 Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-koshland kinetics
abstract
Abstract Motivation: Network inference approaches are widely used to shed light on regulatory interplay between molecular players such as genes and proteins. Biochemical processes underlying networks of interest (e.g. gene regulatory or protein signalling networks) are generally nonlinear. In many settings, knowledge is available concerning relevant chemical kinetics. However, existing network inference methods for continuous, steady-state data are typically rooted in statistical formulations, which do not exploit chemical kinetics to guide inference. Results: Herein, we present an approach to network inference for steady-state data that is rooted in non-linear descriptions of biochemical mechanism. We use equilibrium analysis of chemical kinetics to obtain functional forms that are in turn used to infer networks using steady-state data. The approach we propose is directly applicable to conventional steady-state gene expression or proteomic data and does not require knowledge of either network topology or any kinetic parameters. We illustrate the approach in the context of protein phosphorylation networks, using data simulated from a recent mechanistic model and proteomic data from cancer cell lines. In the former, the true network is known and used for assessment, whereas in the latter, results are compared against known biochemistry. We find that the proposed methodology is more effective at estimating network topology than methods based on linear models. Availability: mukherjeelab.nki.nl/CODE/GK_Kinetics.zip Contact: [email protected]; [email protected] Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Chris J. Oates, Bryan T. J. Hennessy, Yiling Lu, Gordon B. Mills, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.3
2008 Bayesian models based on test statistics for multiple hypothesis testing problems
abstract
MOTIVATION: We propose a Bayesian method for the problem of multiple hypothesis testing that is routinely encountered in bioinformatics research, such as the differential gene expression analysis. Our algorithm is based on modeling the distributions of test statistics under both null and alternative hypotheses. We substantially reduce the complexity of the process of defining posterior model probabilities by modeling the test statistics directly instead of modeling the full data. Computationally, we apply a Bayesian FDR approach to control the number of rejections of null hypotheses. To check if our model assumptions for the test statistics are valid for various bioinformatics experiments, we also propose a simple graphical model-assessment tool. RESULTS: Using extensive simulations, we demonstrate the performance of our models and the utility of the model-assessment tool. In the end, we apply the proposed methodology to an siRNA screening and a gene expression experiment.
Yiling Lu, Gordon B. Mills
Bioinform.2