Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Adam M. Johansen

dblp:43/3875 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3531-7628ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 71% Optimization for machine learning · 16% Learning theory · 8%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
1.122023
Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Generalised Bayesian Filtering via Sequential Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo
1.122023
Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Generalised Bayesian Filtering via Sequential Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
1.022025
Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
1.022025
Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › estimation error bounds
non-asymptotic error bounds
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains › mixing time
log-sobolev inequality
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.912025
Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
particle-based variational inference
0.812024
Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › sequential monte carlo
particle method
0.812024
Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
semi-implicit variational inference
0.812024
Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.812024
Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference
0.712023
Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods
0.712023
Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis
0.212023
Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polyak-łojasiewicz inequality · 1.7gradient flow · 1.7bakry-émery theory · 1.7sequential monte carlo · 1.3divide-and-conquer · 1.3wasserstein gradient flow · 0.8optimal transport · 0.8nesterov accelerated gradient · 0.8markov chain monte carlo · 0.8langevin diffusion · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities
abstract
We derive non-asymptotic error bounds for particle gradient descent (PGD, Kuntz et al. (2023)), a recently introduced algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of large latent variable models obtained by discretizing a gradient flow of the free energy. We begin by showing that the flow converges exponentially fast to the free energy's minimizers for models satisfying a condition that generalizes both the log-Sobolev and the Polyak--Łojasiewicz inequalities (LSI and PŁI, respectively). We achieve this by extending a result well-known in the optimal transport literature (that the LSI implies the Talagrand inequality) and its counterpart in the optimization literature (that the PŁI implies the so-called quadratic growth condition), and applying the extension to our new setting. We also generalize the Bakry--Émery Theorem and show that the LSI/PŁI extension holds for models with strongly concave log-likelihoods. For such models, we further control PGD's discretization error and obtain the non-asymptotic error bounds. While we are motivated by the study of PGD, we believe that the inequalities and results we extend may be of independent interest.
Rocco Caprio, Juan Kuntz, Samuel Power, Adam M. Johansen
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2024 Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood
abstract
Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of latent variable models is often recast as the minimization of a free energy functional over an extended space of parameters and probability distributions. This perspective was recently combined with insights from optimal transport to obtain novel particle-based algorithms for fitting latent variable models to data. Drawing inspiration from prior works which interpret ‘momentum-enriched’ optimization algorithms as discretizations of ordinary differential equations, we propose an analogous dynamical-systems-inspired approach to minimizing the free energy functional. The result is a dynamical system that blends elements of Nesterov’s Accelerated Gradient method, the underdamped Langevin diffusion, and particle methods. Under suitable assumptions, we prove that the continuous-time system minimizes the functional. By discretizing the system, we obtain a practical algorithm for MLE in latent variable models. The algorithm outperforms existing particle methods in numerical experiments and compares favourably with other MLE algorithms.
Jen Ning Lim, Juan Kuntz, Samuel Power, Adam M. Johansen
ICML4
2024 Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference
abstract
Semi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) enriches the expressiveness of variational families by utilizing a kernel and a mixing distribution to hierarchically define the variational distribution. Existing SIVI methods parameterize the mixing distribution using implicit distributions, leading to intractable variational densities. As a result, directly maximizing the evidence lower bound (ELBO) is not possible, so they resort to one of the following: optimizing bounds on the ELBO, employing costly inner-loop Markov chain Monte Carlo runs, or solving minimax objectives. In this paper, we propose a novel method for SIVI called Particle Variational Inference (PVI) which employs empirical measures to approximate the optimal mixing distributions characterized as the minimizer of a free energy functional. PVI arises naturally as a particle approximation of a Euclidean–Wasserstein gradient flow and, unlike prior works, it directly optimizes the ELBO whilst making no parametric assumption about the mixing distribution. Our empirical results demonstrate that PVI performs favourably compared to other SIVI methods across various tasks. Moreover, we provide a theoretical analysis of the behaviour of the gradient flow of a related free energy functional: establishing the existence and uniqueness of solutions as well as propagation of chaos results.
Jen Ning Lim, Adam M. Johansen
NeurIPS2
2023 Particle algorithms for maximum likelihood training of latent variable models
abstract
Neal and Hinton (1998) recast maximum likelihood estimation of any given latent variable model as the minimization of a free energy functional F, and the EM algorithm as coordinate descent applied to F. Here, we explore alternative ways to optimize the functional. In particular, we identify various gradient flows associated with F and show that their limits coincide with F’s stationary points. By discretizing the flows, we obtain practical particle-based algorithms for maximum likelihood estimation in broad classes of latent variable models. The novel algorithms scale to high-dimensional settings and perform well in numerical experiments.
Juan Kuntz, Jen Ning Lim, Adam M. Johansen
AISTATS3
2023 Divide-and-Conquer Fusion
abstract
Combining several (sample approximations of) distributions, which we term sub-posteriors, into a single distribution proportional to their product, is a common challenge. Occurring, for instance, in distributed 'big data' problems, or when working under multi-party privacy constraints. Many existing approaches resort to approximating the individual sub-posteriors for practical necessity, then find either an analytical approximation or sample approximation of the resulting (product-pooled) posterior. The quality of the posterior approximation for these approaches is poor when the sub-posteriors fall out-with a narrow range of distributional form, such as being approximately Gaussian. Recently, a Fusion approach has been proposed which finds an exact Monte Carlo approximation of the posterior, circumventing the drawbacks of approximate approaches. Unfortunately, existing Fusion approaches have a number of computational limitations, particularly when unifying a large number of sub-posteriors. In this paper, we generalise the theory underpinning existing Fusion approaches, and embed the resulting methodology within a recursive divide-and-conquer sequential Monte Carlo paradigm. This ultimately leads to a competitive Fusion approach, which is robust to increasing numbers of sub-posteriors.
Ryan S. Y. Chan, Murray Pollock, Adam M. Johansen, Gareth O. Roberts
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2021 A spatio-temporal model to reveal oscillator phenotypes in molecular clocks: Parameter estimation elucidates circadian gene transcription dynamics in single-cells
abstract
We propose a stochastic distributed delay model together with a Markov random field prior and a measurement model for bioluminescence-reporting to analyse spatio-temporal gene expression in intact networks of cells. The model describes the oscillating time evolution of molecular mRNA counts through a negative transcriptional-translational feedback loop encoded in a chemical Langevin equation with a probabilistic delay distribution. The model is extended spatially by means of a multiplicative random effects model with a first order Markov random field prior distribution. Our methodology effectively separates intrinsic molecular noise, measurement noise, and extrinsic noise and phenotypic variation driving cell heterogeneity, while being amenable to parameter identification and inference. Based on the single-cell model we propose a novel computational stability analysis that allows us to infer two key characteristics, namely the robustness of the oscillations, i.e. whether the reaction network exhibits sustained or damped oscillations, and the profile of the regulation, i.e. whether the inhibition occurs over time in a more distributed versus a more direct manner, which affects the cells' ability to phase-shift to new schedules. We show how insight into the spatio-temporal characteristics of the circadian feedback loop in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) can be gained by applying the methodology to bioluminescence-reported expression of the circadian core clock gene Cry1 across mouse SCN tissue. We find that while (almost) all SCN neurons exhibit robust cell-autonomous oscillations, the parameters that are associated with the regulatory transcription profile give rise to a spatial division of the tissue between the central region whose oscillations are resilient to perturbation in the sense that they maintain a high degree of synchronicity, and the dorsal region which appears to phase shift in a more diversified way as a response to large perturbations and thus could be more amenable to entrainment.
Måns Unosson, Marco Brancaccio, Michael Hastings, Adam M. Johansen, Bärbel Finkenstädt
PLoS Comput. Biol.4
2020 Generalised Bayesian Filtering via Sequential Monte Carlo
abstract
We introduce a framework for inference in general state-space hidden Markov models (HMMs) under likelihood misspecification. In particular, we leverage the loss-theoretic perspective of Generalized Bayesian Inference (GBI) to define generalised filtering recursions in HMMs, that can tackle the problem of inference under model misspecification. In doing so, we arrive at principled procedures for robust inference against observation contamination by utilising the $\beta$-divergence. Operationalising the proposed framework is made possible via sequential Monte Carlo methods (SMC), where the standard particle methods, and their associated convergence results, are readily adapted to the new setting. We demonstrate our approach to object tracking and Gaussian process regression problems, and observe improved performance over standard filtering algorithms.
Ayman Boustati, Ömer Deniz Akyildiz, Theodoros Damoulas, Adam M. Johansen
NeurIPS4
2006 Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimation for Latent Variable Models Using Sequential Monte Carlo
abstract
We present a sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) method for maximum likelihood (ML) parameter estimation in latent variable models. Standard methods rely on gradient algorithms such as the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and its Monte Carlo variants. Our approach is different and motivated by similar considerations to simulated annealing (SA); that is we propose to sample from a sequence of artificial distributions whose support concentrates itself on the set of ML estimates. To achieve this we use SMC methods. We conclude by presenting simulation results on a toy problem and a non-linear non-Gaussian time series model
Adam M. Johansen, Arnaud Doucet, Manuel Davy
ICASSP (3)1