Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark F. St. John

dblp:43/4041 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Language models and text generation · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
contextual constraints
0.011990
Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension · Artif. Intell. 1990
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding
0.011990
Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension · Artif. Intell. 1990
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentence comprehension
0.011990
Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension · Artif. Intell. 1990
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Protecting Privacy during a Pandemic Outbreak
Karsten Martiny, Linda Briesemeister, Grit Denker, Mark F. St. John, Ron Moore
ICISSP4
2021 Decision Support for Sharing Data using Differential Privacy
abstract
Owners of data may wish to share some statistics with others, but they may be worried of privacy of the underlying data. An effective solution to this problem is to employ provable privacy techniques, such as differential privacy, to add noise to the statistics before releasing them. This protection lowers the risk of sharing sensitive data with more or less trusted data sharing partners. Unfortunately, applying differential privacy in its mathematical form requires one to fix certain numeric parameters, which involves subtle computations and expert knowledge that the data owners may lack.In this paper, we first describe a differential privacy parameter selection procedure that minimizes what lay data owners need to know. Second, we describe a user visualization and workflow that makes this procedure available for lay data owners by helping them set the level of noise appropriately to achieve a tolerable risk level. Finally, we describe a user study in which human factors professionals who were native to differential privacy were briefly trained on the concept of using differential privacy for data sharing and then used the visualization to determine an appropriate level of noise.
Mark F. St. John, Grit Denker, Peeter Laud, Karsten Martiny, Alisa Pankova, Dusko Pavlovic
VizSec1
2004 Overview of the DARPA Augmented Cognition Technical Integration Experiment
abstract
The Defense Advance Research Projects Agency Augmented Cognition program is developing innovative technologies that will transform human-computer interactions by making information systems adapt to the changing capabilities and limitations of the user. The first phase of the Augmented Cognition program was to empirically assess the ability of various psychophysiological measures to identify changes in human cognitive activity during task performance in real time. This overview describes the empirical results of a Technical Integration Experiment involving the evaluation of 20 psychophysiological measures from 11 different research groups, including functional Near Infrared imaging, continuous and event-related electrical encephalography, pupil dilation, mouse pressure, body posture, heart rate, and galvanic skin response. These "cognitive state gauges" were evaluated on a common, quasi-realistic, military command and control task called the Warship Commander Task. Participants monitored aircraft on a geographical display for their levels of threat and responded to the threatening ones, as they simultaneously monitored ship communications for ship status information. The task involves a combination of perceptual, motor, spatial, auditory, verbal, memory, and decision-making processing. Task load was manipulated by changing the quantity and types of aircraft appearing throughout the primary task and by varying the presence or absence of the secondary verbal-memory task. Eleven of the gauges significantly identified changes in cognitive activity during the task. This overview summarizes the results and examines the prospects for the successful transition of these cognitive state gauges to operational military human-machine systems.
Mark F. St. John, David A. Kobus, Jeffrey G. Morrison, Dylan Schmorrow
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.1
1990 Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension
Mark F. St. John, James L. McClelland
Artif. Intell.1