Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Grant Miller
dblp:43/434
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 82% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Optimizing Interventions via Offline Policy Evaluation: Studies in Citizen Science · AAAI 2018 |
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Intervention Strategies for Increasing Engagement in Crowdsourcing: Platform, Predictions, and Experiments · IJCAI 2016 |
Collaborative and social computing
worker engagement |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Intervention Strategies for Increasing Engagement in Crowdsourcing: Platform, Predictions, and Experiments · IJCAI 2016 |
Environmental and earth informatics
citizen science |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Optimizing Interventions via Offline Policy Evaluation: Studies in Citizen Science · AAAI 2018 |
High-performance computing › supercomputing
petascale computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Approaching petascale - Approaching petascale computing · SC 2006 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing
HPC applications |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Approaching petascale - Approaching petascale computing · SC 2006 |
High-performance computing › supercomputing
leadership-class systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Approaching petascale - Approaching petascale computing · SC 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
offline policy evaluation · 0.7model-based reinforcement learning · 0.7AI planning · 0.7machine learning · 0.5field experiments · 0.2field experiment · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A hybrid attribute based access control model applied to data in a hybrid cloud environmentabstractAttribute Based Access Control (ABAC) has become more broadly adopted by enterprises around the world to provide more dynamic controls to accessing data than Role Based Access Control (RBAC). The challenge is that RBAC is still widely used inside enterprises and ABAC has several limitations reducing its benefits and slowing adoption. Grant Miller |
SYSTOR | 1 |
| 2018 | Optimizing Interventions via Offline Policy Evaluation: Studies in Citizen ScienceabstractVolunteers who help with online crowdsourcing such as citizen science tasks typically make only a few contributions before exiting. We propose a computational approach for increasing users' engagement in such settings that is based on optimizing policies for displaying motivational messages to users. The approach, which we refer to as Trajectory Corrected Intervention (TCI), reasons about the tradeoff between the long-term influence of engagement messages on participants' contributions and the potential risk of disrupting their current work. We combine model-based reinforcement learning with off-line policy evaluation to generate intervention policies, without relying on a fixed representation of the domain. TCI works iteratively to learn the best representation from a set of random intervention trials and to generate candidate intervention policies. It is able to refine selected policies off-line by exploiting the fact that users can only be interrupted once per session.We implemented TCI in the wild with Galaxy Zoo, one of the largest citizen science platforms on the web. We found that TCI was able to outperform the state-of-the-art intervention policy for this domain, and significantly increased the contributions of thousands of users. This work demonstrates the benefit of combining traditional AI planning with off-line policy methods to generate intelligent intervention strategies. Avi Segal, Kobi Gal, Ece Kamar, Eric Horvitz, Grant Miller |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2016 | Intervention Strategies for Increasing Engagement in Crowdsourcing: Platform, Predictions, and Experiments
Avi Segal, Kobi Gal, Ece Kamar, Eric Horvitz, Alex Bowyer, Grant Miller |
IJCAI | 6 |
| 2010 | Clustering of Vehicle TrajectoriesabstractWe present a method that is suitable for clustering of vehicle trajectories obtained by an automated vision system. We combine ideas from two spectral clustering methods and propose a trajectory-similarity measure based on the Hausdorff distance, with modifications to improve its robustness and account for the fact that trajectories are ordered collections of points. We compare the proposed method with two well-known trajectory-clustering methods on a few real-world data sets. Stefan Atev, Grant Miller, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos |
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. | 2 |
| 2006 | Approaching petascale - Approaching petascale computingabstractSeveral federal agencies have announced plans to acquire large scale systems within the next few years which will have peak performance in the petascale range. In order to make sure that end users can take maximum advantage of these systems, Federal agencies, cooperating through the NITRD Program are following a multi-faceted approach which: 1) provides access to leadership class platforms at DOD, DOE, NASA and NSF, 2) determines how to handle data on the petabyte scale through their File Systems and I/O activities, and 3) aids the development of petascale applications through support of multi-disciplinary teams as in DOE/SC SciDAC Program, NSF science application programs, and DOE/NNSA ASC Academic Alliance Program for example. In addition, the DARPA HPCS Program is focused on the development of next generation architectures that will substantially improve the productivity, useability and application scope of multi-petaflop systems. This BOF, presented by the HEC IWG will review the implementation, status and future plans for these and other activities. Grant Miller |
SC | 1 |