EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas G. Allen
dblp:43/5195
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
classifier combination |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Copula Based Classifier Fusion Under Statistical Dependence · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
copula models |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Copula Based Classifier Fusion Under Statistical Dependence · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probability score fusion · 0.3copula theory · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Copula Based Classifier Fusion Under Statistical DependenceabstractWe consider the problem of fusing probability scores from a set of classifiers to estimate a final fused probability score. Our interest is in scenarios where the classifiers are statistically dependent. To that end, we propose a new classifier fusion approach that is data driven and founded on the statistical theory of copulas. Numerical results with both simulated and real data show that our copula based classifier fusion approach produces better probability scores than individual classifiers and outperforms existing probability score fusion approaches. Onur Ozdemir, Thomas G. Allen, Sora Choi, Thakshila Wimalajeewa, Pramod K. Varshney |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 1994 | Likelihood-Based Texture Discrimination with Multiscale Stochastic ModelsabstractA class of multiscale models describing stochastic processes indexed by the nodes of a tree has recently been introduced by Chou et al. (1994). Experimental and theoretical results indicate that this class of models is quite rich, and moreover these models lead to extremely efficient algorithms for optimal estimation based on noisy observations. This motivates further algorithmic development, and in particular, in this paper we present a likelihood calculation algorithm for this class of multiscale models. That is, we consider the problem of computing the log of the conditional probability of a set of data assuming that they correspond to a particular multiscale model. We exploit the structure of the multiscale models to develop an efficient, scale recursive algorithm that allows for multiresolution data and parameters which vary in both space and scale. We illustrate one possible application of the algorithm to a texture classification problem in which one must choose from a given set of models that model which best represents or most likely corresponds to a given set of random field measurements. Texture modeling with Gaussian Markov random field (GMRF) models is well documented. One difficulty in using GMRF models, however, is that the calculation of likelihoods may be prohibitively complex computationally if there is an irregular sampling pattern. It is shown here that GMRF models can be represented within our multiscale model class which allows us to approximately compute likelihoods for GMRF models based on measurements over arbitrarily sampled regions. As we demonstrate in the context of texture discrimination problems, the multiscale approach not only leads to computationally efficient implementations, but also to virtually the same performance as the optimal GMRF-based likelihood ratio test. We discuss further applications in the area of synthetic aperture radar imagery processing.> Mark R. Luettgen, Thomas G. Allen, Robert R. Tenney |
ICIP (3) | 2 |