Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kuzman Ganchev

dblp:43/5339 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
22ranked-venue papers
7as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 21 · 7 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
12 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 52% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Language models and text generation · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
chinese word segmentation
0.312018
State-of-the-art Chinese Word Segmentation with Bi-LSTMs · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.322013
Cross-Lingual Discriminative Learning of Sequence Models with Posterior Regularization · EMNLP 2013
Posterior vs Parameter Sparsity in Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling
0.212015
Semantic Role Labeling with Neural Network Factors · EMNLP 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
posterior regularization
0.222010
Posterior Regularization for Structured Latent Variable Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010
Posterior vs Parameter Sparsity in Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.222009
Posterior vs Parameter Sparsity in Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2009
Expectation Maximization and Posterior Constraints · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer
0.212013
Cross-Lingual Discriminative Learning of Sequence Models with Posterior Regularization · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.212013
Cross-Lingual Discriminative Learning of Sequence Models with Posterior Regularization · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.212013
Cross-Lingual Discriminative Learning of Sequence Models with Posterior Regularization · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.222008
Better Alignments = Better Translations? · ACL 2008
Expectation Maximization and Posterior Constraints · NIPS 2007
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.112011
Posterior Sparsity in Unsupervised Dependency Parsing · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
unsupervised dependency parsing
0.112011
Posterior Sparsity in Unsupervised Dependency Parsing · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent structure discovery
0.112010
Posterior Regularization for Structured Latent Variable Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.122008
Expectation Maximization and Posterior Constraints · NIPS 2007
Better Alignments = Better Translations? · ACL 2008
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › grammar induction
dependency grammar induction
0.112009
Dependency Grammar Induction via Bitext Projection Constraints · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization
0.112007
Expectation Maximization and Posterior Constraints · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation › expectation-maximization
variational EM
0.012009
Posterior vs Parameter Sparsity in Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.012009
Posterior vs Parameter Sparsity in Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2009
Data mining
clustering
0.012007
Expectation Maximization and Posterior Constraints · NIPS 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

posterior regularization · 0.4neural network architecture · 0.3bidirectional LSTM · 0.3transition-based parsing · 0.2globally normalized neural networks · 0.2expectation-maximization · 0.2product of experts · 0.2neural network · 0.2graphical model · 0.2word embeddings · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Dolomites: Domain-Specific Long-Form Methodical Tasks
abstract
Abstract Experts in various fields routinely perform methodical writing tasks to plan, organize, and report their work. From a clinician writing a differential diagnosis for a patient, to a teacher writing a lesson plan for students, these tasks are pervasive, requiring to methodically generate structured long-form output for a given input. We develop a typology of methodical tasks structured in the form of a task objective, procedure, input, and output, and introduce DoLoMiTes, a novel benchmark with specifications for 519 such tasks elicited from hundreds of experts from across 25 fields. Our benchmark further contains specific instantiations of methodical tasks with concrete input and output examples (1,857 in total) which we obtain by collecting expert revisions of up to 10 model-generated examples of each task. We use these examples to evaluate contemporary language models, highlighting that automating methodical tasks is a challenging long-form generation problem, as it requires performing complex inferences, while drawing upon the given context as well as domain knowledge. Our dataset is available at https://dolomites-benchmark.github.io/.
Chaitanya Malaviya, Priyanka Agrawal, Kuzman Ganchev, Pranesh Srinivasan, Fantine Huot, Jonathan Berant, Mark Yatskar, Dipanjan Das 0001, Mirella Lapata, Christopher Alberti
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics3
2023 QAmeleon: Multilingual QA with Only 5 Examples
abstract
Abstract The availability of large, high-quality datasets has been a major driver of recent progress in question answering (QA). Such annotated datasets, however, are difficult and costly to collect, and rarely exist in languages other than English, rendering QA technology inaccessible to underrepresented languages. An alternative to building large monolingual training datasets is to leverage pre-trained language models (PLMs) under a few-shot learning setting. Our approach, QAmeleon, uses a PLM to automatically generate multilingual data upon which QA models are fine-tuned, thus avoiding costly annotation. Prompt tuning the PLM with only five examples per language delivers accuracy superior to translation-based baselines; it bridges nearly 60% of the gap between an English-only baseline and a fully-supervised upper bound fine-tuned on almost 50,000 hand-labeled examples; and consistently leads to improvements compared to directly fine-tuning a QA model on labeled examples in low resource settings. Experiments on the TyDiqa-GoldP and MLQA benchmarks show that few-shot prompt tuning for data synthesis scales across languages and is a viable alternative to large-scale annotation.1
Priyanka Agrawal, Christopher Alberti, Fantine Huot, Joshua Maynez, Ji Ma 0004, Sebastian Ruder, Kuzman Ganchev, Dipanjan Das 0001, Mirella Lapata
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics7
2023 Conditional Generation with a Question-Answering Blueprint
abstract
Abstract The ability to convey relevant and faithful information is critical for many tasks in conditional generation and yet remains elusive for neural seq-to-seq models whose outputs often reveal hallucinations and fail to correctly cover important details. In this work, we advocate planning as a useful intermediate representation for rendering conditional generation less opaque and more grounded. We propose a new conceptualization of text plans as a sequence of question-answer (QA) pairs and enhance existing datasets (e.g., for summarization) with a QA blueprint operating as a proxy for content selection (i.e., what to say) and planning (i.e., in what order). We obtain blueprints automatically by exploiting state-of-the-art question generation technology and convert input-output pairs into input-blueprint-output tuples. We develop Transformer-based models, each varying in how they incorporate the blueprint in the generated output (e.g., as a global plan or iteratively). Evaluation across metrics and datasets demonstrates that blueprint models are more factual than alternatives which do not resort to planning and allow tighter control of the generation output.
Shashi Narayan, Joshua Maynez, Reinald Kim Amplayo, Kuzman Ganchev, Annie Louis, Fantine Huot, Anders Sandholm 0001, Dipanjan Das 0001, Mirella Lapata
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics4
2018 State-of-the-art Chinese Word Segmentation with Bi-LSTMs
abstract
A wide variety of neural-network architectures have been proposed for the task of Chinese word segmentation.Surprisingly, we find that a bidirectional LSTM model, when combined with standard deep learning techniques and best practices, can achieve better accuracy on many of the popular datasets as compared to models based on more complex neuralnetwork architectures.Furthermore, our error analysis shows that out-of-vocabulary words remain challenging for neural-network models, and many of the remaining errors are unlikely to be fixed through architecture changes.Instead, more effort should be made on exploring resources for further improvement.
Ji Ma 0004, Kuzman Ganchev, David Weiss 0001
EMNLP2
2016 Globally Normalized Transition-Based Neural Networks
abstract
Daniel Andor, Chris Alberti, David Weiss, Aliaksei Severyn, Alessandro Presta, Kuzman Ganchev, Slav Petrov, Michael Collins. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2016.
Daniel Andor, Christopher Alberti, David Weiss 0001, Aliaksei Severyn, Alessandro Presta, Kuzman Ganchev, Slav Petrov, Michael Collins 0001
ACL (1)6
2015 Semantic Role Labeling with Neural Network Factors
abstract
We present a new method for semantic role labeling in which arguments and semantic roles are jointly embedded in a shared vector space for a given predicate.These embeddings belong to a neural network, whose output represents the potential functions of a graphical model designed for the SRL task.We consider both local and structured learning methods and obtain strong results on standard PropBank and FrameNet corpora with a straightforward product-of-experts model.We further show how the model can learn jointly from PropBank and FrameNet annotations to obtain additional improvements on the smaller FrameNet dataset.
Nicholas FitzGerald, Oscar Täckström, Kuzman Ganchev, Dipanjan Das 0001
EMNLP3
2015 Efficient Inference and Structured Learning for Semantic Role Labeling
abstract
We present a dynamic programming algorithm for efficient constrained inference in semantic role labeling. The algorithm tractably captures a majority of the structural constraints examined by prior work in this area, which has resorted to either approximate methods or off-the-shelf integer linear programming solvers. In addition, it allows training a globally-normalized log-linear model with respect to constrained conditional likelihood. We show that the dynamic program is several times faster than an off-the-shelf integer linear programming solver, while reaching the same solution. Furthermore, we show that our structured model results in significant improvements over its local counterpart, achieving state-of-the-art results on both PropBank- and FrameNet-annotated corpora.
Oscar Täckström, Kuzman Ganchev, Dipanjan Das 0001
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2014 Semantic Frame Identification with Distributed Word Representations
abstract
A computer-implemented technique can include receiving, at a server, labeled training data including a plurality of groups of words, each group of words having a predicate word, each word having generic word embeddings. The technique can include extracting, at the server, the plurality of groups of words in a syntactic context of their predicate words. The technique can include concatenating, at the server, the generic word embeddings to create a high dimensional vector space representing features for each word. The technique can include obtaining, at the server, a model having a learned mapping from the high dimensional vector space to a low dimensional vector space and learned embeddings for each possible semantic frame in the low dimensional vector space. The technique can also include outputting, by the server, the model for storage, the model being configured to identify a specific semantic frame for an input.
Karl Moritz Hermann, Dipanjan Das 0001, Jason Weston, Kuzman Ganchev
ACL (1)4
2013 Cross-Lingual Discriminative Learning of Sequence Models with Posterior Regularization
abstract
We present a framework for cross-lingual transfer of sequence information from a resource-rich source language to a resourceimpoverished target language that incorporates soft constraints via posterior regularization.To this end, we use automatically word aligned bitext between the source and target language pair, and learn a discriminative conditional random field model on the target side.Our posterior regularization constraints are derived from simple intuitions about the task at hand and from cross-lingual alignment information.We show improvements over strong baselines for two tasks: part-of-speech tagging and namedentity segmentation.
Kuzman Ganchev, Dipanjan Das 0001
EMNLP1
2011 Controlling Complexity in Part-of-Speech Induction
abstract
We consider the problem of fully unsupervised learning of grammatical (part-of-speech) categories from unlabeled text. The standard maximum-likelihood hidden Markov model for this task performs poorly, because of its weak inductive bias and large model capacity. We address this problem by refining the model and modifying the learning objective to control its capacity via para- metric and non-parametric constraints. Our approach enforces word-category association sparsity, adds morphological and orthographic features, and eliminates hard-to-estimate parameters for rare words. We develop an efficient learning algorithm that is not much more computationally intensive than standard training. We also provide an open-source implementation of the algorithm. Our experiments on five diverse languages (Bulgarian, Danish, English, Portuguese, Spanish) achieve significant improvements compared with previous methods for the same task.
João Graça, Kuzman Ganchev, Luísa Coheur, Fernando Pereira 0003, Ben Taskar
J. Artif. Intell. Res.2
2011 Posterior Sparsity in Unsupervised Dependency Parsing
Jennifer Gillenwater, Kuzman Ganchev, João Graça, Fernando Pereira 0003, Ben Taskar
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2010 Learning Tractable Word Alignment Models with Complex Constraints
abstract
Word-level alignment of bilingual text is a critical resource for a growing variety of tasks. Probabilistic models for word alignment present a fundamental trade-off between richness of captured constraints and correlations versus efficiency and tractability of inference. In this article, we use the Posterior Regularization framework (Graça, Ganchev, and Taskar 2007) to incorporate complex constraints into probabilistic models during learning without changing the efficiency of the underlying model. We focus on the simple and tractable hidden Markov model, and present an efficient learning algorithm for incorporating approximate bijectivity and symmetry constraints. Models estimated with these constraints produce a significant boost in performance as measured by both precision and recall of manually annotated alignments for six language pairs. We also report experiments on two different tasks where word alignments are required: phrase-based machine translation and syntax transfer, and show promising improvements over standard methods.
João Graça, Kuzman Ganchev, Ben Taskar
Comput. Linguistics2
2010 Posterior Regularization for Structured Latent Variable Models
Kuzman Ganchev, João Graça, Jennifer Gillenwater, Ben Taskar
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2009 Dependency Grammar Induction via Bitext Projection Constraints
Kuzman Ganchev, Jennifer Gillenwater, Ben Taskar
ACL/IJCNLP1
2009 Posterior vs Parameter Sparsity in Latent Variable Models
abstract
In this paper we explore the problem of biasing unsupervised models to favor sparsity. We extend the posterior regularization framework [8] to encourage the model to achieve posterior sparsity on the unlabeled training data. We apply this new method to learn first-order HMMs for unsupervised part-of-speech (POS) tagging, and show that HMMs learned this way consistently and significantly out-performs both EM-trained HMMs, and HMMs with a sparsity-inducing Dirichlet prior trained by variational EM. We evaluate these HMMs on three languages — English, Bulgarian and Portuguese — under four conditions. We find that our method always improves performance with respect to both baselines, while variational Bayes actually degrades performance in most cases. We increase accuracy with respect to EM by 2.5%-8.7% absolute and we see improvements even in a semisupervised condition where a limited dictionary is provided.
João Graça, Kuzman Ganchev, Ben Taskar, Fernando Pereira 0003
NIPS2
2009 Censored Exploration and the Dark Pool Problem
Kuzman Ganchev, Michael Kearns, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
UAI1
2008 Better Alignments = Better Translations?
Kuzman Ganchev, João Graça, Ben Taskar
ACL1
2008 Multi-View Learning over Structured and Non-Identical Outputs
Kuzman Ganchev, João Graça, John Blitzer, Ben Taskar
UAI1
2008 Multi-View Learning over Structured and Non-Identical Outputs
Kuzman Ganchev, João Graça, John Blitzer, Ben Taskar
UAI1
2007 Frustratingly Hard Domain Adaptation for Dependency Parsing
Mark Dredze, John Blitzer, Partha P. Talukdar, Kuzman Ganchev, João Graça, Fernando Pereira 0003
EMNLP-CoNLL4
2007 Expectation Maximization and Posterior Constraints
abstract
The expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is a widely used maximum likelihood estimation procedure for statistical models when the values of some of the variables in the model are not observed. Very often, however, our aim is primarily to find a model that assigns values to the latent variables that have intended meaning for our data and maximizing expected likelihood only sometimes accomplishes this. Unfortunately, it is typically difficult to add even simple a-priori information about latent variables in graphical models without making the models overly complex or intractable. In this paper, we present an efficient, principled way to inject rich constraints on the posteriors of latent variables into the EM algorithm. Our method can be used to learn tractable graphical models that satisfy additional, otherwise intractable constraints. Focusing on clustering and the alignment problem for statistical machine translation, we show that simple, intuitive posterior constraints can greatly improve the performance over standard baselines and be competitive with more complex, intractable models.
João Graça, Kuzman Ganchev, Ben Taskar
NIPS2
2003 Nswap: A Network Swapping Module for Linux Clusters
Tia Newhall, Sean Finney, Kuzman Ganchev, Michael Spiegel
Euro-Par3