Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hesham A. Al-Twaijry

dblp:43/5927 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Integrated circuit design · 83% Electronic design automation · 8% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.011998
Technology Scaling Effects on Multipliers · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design › arithmetic circuit design
multiplier design
0.011998
Technology Scaling Effects on Multipliers · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998
Integrated circuit design
technology scaling
0.011998
Technology Scaling Effects on Multipliers · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998
Electronic design automation › timing analysis
delay modeling
0.011998
Technology Scaling Effects on Multipliers · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
interconnect delay
0.011998
Technology Scaling Effects on Multipliers · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

circuit simulation · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Technology Scaling Effects on Multipliers
abstract
Since integrated circuits were invented, fabrication engineers have been able to steadily decrease the dimensions of the devices (transistors). These reductions in the minimum feature sizes have resulted in improved performance. In addition, the dimensions of the interconnect used to connect the active transistors have also scaled. The decreasing dimensions of the physical devices causes the capacitance and resistances of the different parts of the multiplier to change. Therefore, the relative delay due to each part of the multiplier changes. In addition, the different encoding schemes used to generate the partial products and the different topologies used in the reduction of the partial products effect the total latency of the multiplier. This paper examines the effects of the smaller device dimensions on multipliers. It shows that the interconnect is becoming more important and that automatic generation of partial products provides the minimum latency for small feature sizes.
Hesham A. Al-Twaijry, Michael J. Flynn
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1997 The SNAP Project: Design of Floating Point Arithmetic Unit
abstract
In recent years computer applications have increased in their computational complexity. The industry wide usage of performance benchmarks, such as SPECmarks, and the popularity of 3D graphics applications forces processor designers to pay particular attention to implementation of the floating point unit, or FPU. The paper presents results of the Stanford subnanosecond arithmetic processor (SNAP) research effort in the design of hardware for floating point addition, multiplication and division. We show that one cycle FP addition is achievable 32% of the time using a variable latency algorithm. For multiplication, a binary tree is often inferior to a Wallace tree designed using an algorithmic layout approach for contemporary feature sizes (0.3 /spl mu/m). Further, in most cases two bit Booth encoding of the multiplier is preferable to non Booth encoding for partial product generation. It appears that for division, optimum area performance is achieved using functional iteration, and we present two techniques to further reduce average division latency.
Stuart F. Oberman, Hesham A. Al-Twaijry, Michael J. Flynn
IEEE Symposium on Computer Arithmetic2