Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jim C. Huang
dblp:43/760
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 69% Approximation and online algorithms · 15% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 15% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 88% Learning theory · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 52% Computational science and engineering · 33% Computational finance and economics · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Online Dual Decomposition for Performance and Delivery-Based Distributed Ad Allocation · KDD 2016 Adaptive Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Long-term Constraints · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.3 | 3 | 2011 | Cumulative Distribution Networks and the Derivative-sum-product Algorithm: Models and Inference for Cumulative Distribution Functions on Graphs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 Exact inference and learning for cumulative distribution functions on loopy graphs · NIPS 2010 Structured ranking learning using cumulative distribution networks · NIPS 2008 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › resource allocation
ad allocation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Online Dual Decomposition for Performance and Delivery-Based Distributed Ad Allocation · KDD 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Adaptive Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Long-term Constraints · ICML 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › large-scale optimization › decomposition methods
dual decomposition |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Online Dual Decomposition for Performance and Delivery-Based Distributed Ad Allocation · KDD 2016 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online allocation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Online Dual Decomposition for Performance and Delivery-Based Distributed Ad Allocation · KDD 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Cumulative Distribution Networks and the Derivative-sum-product Algorithm: Models and Inference for Cumulative Distribution Functions on Graphs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Variable Selection through Correlation Sifting · RECOMB 2011 |
Computational science and engineering › model selection
variable selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Variable Selection through Correlation Sifting · RECOMB 2011 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Variable Selection through Correlation Sifting · RECOMB 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
junction tree inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Exact inference and learning for cumulative distribution functions on loopy graphs · NIPS 2010 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Structured ranking learning using cumulative distribution networks · NIPS 2008 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Structured ranking learning using cumulative distribution networks · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Adaptive Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Long-term Constraints · ICML 2016 |
Computational finance and economics › online advertising
display advertising |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Online Dual Decomposition for Performance and Delivery-Based Distributed Ad Allocation · KDD 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Detecting MicroRNA Targets by Linking Sequence, MicroRNA and Gene Expression Data · RECOMB 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
integrative genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Detecting MicroRNA Targets by Linking Sequence, MicroRNA and Gene Expression Data · RECOMB 2006 |
Information retrieval
document retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Structured ranking learning using cumulative distribution networks · NIPS 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret analysis · 0.5online gradient descent · 0.5online convex optimization · 0.5dual decomposition · 0.5adaptive algorithm · 0.5correlation sifting · 0.2symbolic differentiation · 0.2junction tree decomposition · 0.2structured prediction · 0.2joint CDF modeling · 0.2cumulative distribution network · 0.2message passing · 0.1graphical model inference · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Adaptive Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Long-term ConstraintsabstractWe present an adaptive online gradient descent algorithm to solve online convex optimization problems with long-term constraints, which are constraints that need to be satisfied when accumulated over a finite number of rounds T, but can be violated in intermediate rounds. For some user-defined trade-off parameter βin (0, 1), the proposed algorithm achieves cumulative regret bounds of O(T^maxβ,1_β) and O(T^1_β/2), respectively for the loss and the constraint violations. Our results hold for convex losses, can handle arbitrary convex constraints and rely on a single computationally efficient algorithm. Our contributions improve over the best known cumulative regret bounds of Mahdavi et al. (2012), which are respectively O(T^1/2) and O(T^3/4) for general convex domains, and respectively O(T^2/3) and O(T^2/3) when the domain is further restricted to be a polyhedral set. We supplement the analysis with experiments validating the performance of our algorithm in practice. Rodolphe Jenatton, Jim C. Huang, Cédric Archambeau |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | Online Dual Decomposition for Performance and Delivery-Based Distributed Ad AllocationabstractOnline optimization is central to display advertising, where we must sequentially allocate ad impressions to maximize the total welfare among advertisers, while respecting various advertiser-specified long-term constraints (e.g., total amount of the ad's budget that is consumed at the end of the campaign). In this paper, we present the online dual decomposition (ODD) framework for large-scale, online, distributed ad allocation, which combines dual decomposition and online convex optimization. ODD allows us to account for the distributed and the online nature of the ad allocation problem and is extensible to a variety of ad allocation problems arising in real-world display advertising systems. Moreover, ODD does not require assumptions about auction dynamics, stochastic or adversarial feedback, or any other characteristics of the ad marketplace. We further provide guarantees for the online solution as measured by bounds on cumulative regret. The regret analysis accounts for the impact of having to estimate constraints in an online setting before they are observed and for the dependence on the smoothness with which constraints and constraint violations are generated. We provide an extensive set of results from a large-scale production advertising system at Amazon to validate the framework and compare its behavior to various ad allocation algorithms. Jim C. Huang, Rodolphe Jenatton, Cédric Archambeau |
KDD | 1 |
| 2011 | Variable Selection through Correlation Sifting
Jim C. Huang, Nebojsa Jojic |
RECOMB | 1 |
| 2011 | Cumulative Distribution Networks and the Derivative-sum-product Algorithm: Models and Inference for Cumulative Distribution Functions on Graphs
Jim C. Huang, Brendan J. Frey |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2010 | Exact inference and learning for cumulative distribution functions on loopy graphsabstractProbabilistic graphical models use local factors to represent dependence among sets of variables. For many problem domains, for instance climatology and epidemiology, in addition to local dependencies, we may also wish to model heavy-tailed statistics, where extreme deviations should not be treated as outliers. Specifying such distributions using graphical models for probability density functions (PDFs) generally lead to intractable inference and learning. Cumulative distribution networks (CDNs) provide a means to tractably specify multivariate heavy-tailed models as a product of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs). Currently, algorithms for inference and learning, which correspond to computing mixed derivatives, are exact only for tree-structured graphs. For graphs of arbitrary topology, an efficient algorithm is needed that takes advantage of the sparse structure of the model, unlike symbolic differentiation programs such as Mathematica and D* that do not. We present an algorithm for recursively decomposing the computation of derivatives for CDNs of arbitrary topology, where the decomposition is naturally described using junction trees. We compare the performance of the resulting algorithm to Mathematica and D*, and we apply our method to learning models for rainfall and H1N1 data, where we show that CDNs with cycles are able to provide a significantly better fits to the data as compared to tree-structured and unstructured CDNs and other heavy-tailed multivariate distributions such as the multivariate copula and logistic models. Jim C. Huang, Nebojsa Jojic, Christopher Meek |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2008 | Structured ranking learning using cumulative distribution networksabstractRanking is at the heart of many information retrieval applications. Unlike standard regression or classification, in which we predict outputs independently, in ranking, we are interested in predicting structured outputs so that misranking one object can significantly affect whether we correctly rank the other objects. In practice, the problem of ranking involves a large number of objects to be ranked and either approximate structured prediction methods are required, or assumptions of independence between object scores must be made in order to make the problem tractable. We present a probabilistic method for learning to rank using the graphical modelling framework of cumulative distribution networks (CDNs), where we can take into account the structure inherent to the problem of ranking by modelling the joint cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) over multiple pairwise preferences. We apply our framework to the problem of document retrieval in the case of the OHSUMED benchmark dataset. We will show that the RankNet, ListNet and ListMLE probabilistic models can be viewed as particular instances of CDNs and that our proposed framework allows for the exploration of a broad class of flexible structured loss functionals for ranking learning. Jim C. Huang, Brendan J. Frey |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2008 | Cumulative distribution networks and the derivative-sum-product algorithm
Jim C. Huang, Brendan J. Frey |
UAI | 1 |
| 2006 | Detecting MicroRNA Targets by Linking Sequence, MicroRNA and Gene Expression Data
Jim C. Huang, Quaid Morris, Brendan J. Frey |
RECOMB | 1 |