Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jin Ke 0002

dblp:43/8079-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8516-8894ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 75% Query processing and optimization · 25%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
entailment
0.812024
Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with Reasoning · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology reasoning
0.812024
Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with Reasoning · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Query processing and optimization
constraint validation
0.812024
Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with Reasoning · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph quality
0.812024
Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with Reasoning · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph validation
0.812024
Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with Reasoning · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph validation
SHACL validation
0.812024
Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with Reasoning · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

targeted reasoning · 1.5entity merging · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SHACL Dashboard: Analyzing Data Quality Reports Over Large-Scale Knowledge Graphs
Johannes Mäkelburg, Zenon G. Zacouris, Jin Ke 0002, Maribel Acosta
ISWC (2)3
2025 UpSHACL: Targeted Constraint Validation for Updates over Knowledge Graphs
Zenon G. Zacouris, Jin Ke 0002, Maribel Acosta
ISWC (1)2
2024 Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with Reasoning
abstract
As the usage of knowledge graphs (KGs) becomes more pervasive in practical applications, there is a burgeoning need for high-quality data. The SHApes Constraint Language (SHACL) allows for expressing certain types of quality constraints that define sub-structures and correct values in KGs modelled with RDF. Nevertheless, performing SHACL validation without entailment often yields onesided outcomes, as it falls short of validating crucial implicit data encoded in the KG ontology. Current solutions that incorporate entailment into SHACL validation are inefficient, due to the time-intensive process of applying inference rules to the entire dataset. Moreover, applying entailment for SHACL validation can generate large amounts of redundant triples, exacerbating the validation workload and resulting in erroneous or redundant validation results. In light of these challenges, we propose Re-SHACL, an approach that combines targeted reasoning and entity merging techniques to generate a concise, consolidated RDF graph devoid of redundancy. Re-SHACL significantly reduces execution time and improves the accuracy of the validation reports. Our experiments demonstrate that Re-SHACL can be combined with state-of-the-art validators to deliver accurate validation reports efficiently.
Jin Ke 0002, Zenon G. Zacouris, Maribel Acosta
Proc. VLDB Endow.1