Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marcus Göransson

dblp:430/2109 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-9650-7917ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Design research and methods · 30% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23% Human-robot interaction · 23%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Autonomous driving · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
automotive user interfaces
1.012026
A Collaborative Crowdsourcing Method for Designing External Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles · CHI 2026
Human-robot interaction › automated vehicles
external human-machine interface
1.012026
A Collaborative Crowdsourcing Method for Designing External Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles · CHI 2026
Design research and methods
participatory design
1.012026
A Collaborative Crowdsourcing Method for Designing External Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles · CHI 2026
Robotics › Autonomous driving
human factors of automated vehicles
0.312026
A Collaborative Crowdsourcing Method for Designing External Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

video-based simulation · 2.0expert feedback · 2.0crowd creativity · 2.0scoping review · 1.0framework development · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Collaborative Crowdsourcing Method for Designing External Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles
abstract
Participatory design effectively engages stakeholders in technology development but is often constrained by small, resource-intensive activities. This study explores a scalable complementary method, enabling broad pattern identification in the design for interfaces in autonomous vehicles. We implemented a human-centered, iterative process that combined crowd creativity, structured participatory principles, and expert feedback. Across iterations, participant concepts evolved from simple cues to multimodal systems. Novel suggestions ranged from personalized features, like tracking lights, to inclusive elements like haptic feedback, progressively refining designs toward greater contextual awareness. To assess outcomes, we compared representative designs: a popular-design, reflecting the most frequently proposed ideas, and an innovative-design, merging participant innovations with expert input. Both were evaluated against a benchmark through video-based simulations. Results show that the popular-design outperformed the alternatives on both interpretability and user experience, with expert-validated innovations performing second best. These findings highlight the potential of scalable participatory methods for shaping emerging technologies.
Ronald Cumbal, Marcus Göransson, Alexandros Rouchitsas, Didem Gürdür Broo, Ginevra Castellano
CHI2
2026 Operationalizing Perceptions of Agent Gender: Foundations and Guidelines
abstract
The “gender” of intelligent agents, virtual characters, social robots, and other agentic machines has emerged as a fundamental topic in studies of people’s interactions with computers. Perceptions of agent gender can help explain user attitudes and behaviours—from preferences to toxicity to stereotyping—across a variety of systems and contexts of use. Yet, standards in capturing perceptions of agent gender do not exist. A scoping review was conducted to clarify how agent gender has been operationalized—labelled, defined, and measured—as a perceptual variable. One-third of studies manipulated but did not measure agent gender. Norms in operationalizations remain obscure, limiting comprehension of results, congruity in measurement, and comparability for meta-analyses. The dominance of the gender binary model and latent anthropocentrism have placed arbitrary limits on knowledge generation and reified the status quo. We contribute a systematically-developed and theory-driven meta-level framework that offers operational clarity and practical guidance for greater rigour and inclusivity.
Katie Seaborn, Madeleine Steeds, Ilaria Torre 0002, Martina De Cet, Katie Winkle, Marcus Göransson
CHI6