EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xuanqiang Angelo Huang
dblp:430/6601
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 70% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
continuous representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Models Are Implicitly Continuous · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Models Are Implicitly Continuous · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
transformer language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Models Are Implicitly Continuous · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Language Models Are Implicitly Continuous · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
continuous-time function approximation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Language Models Are Implicitly ContinuousabstractLanguage is typically modelled with discrete sequences. However, the most successful approaches to language modelling, namely neural networks, are continuous and smooth function approximators.
In this work, we show that Transformer-based language models implicitly learn to represent sentences as continuous-time functions defined over a continuous input space.
This phenomenon occurs in most state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs), including Llama2, Llama3, Phi3, Gemma, Gemma2, and Mistral, and suggests that LLMs reason about language in ways that fundamentally differ from humans.
Our work formally extends Transformers to capture the nuances of time and space continuity in both input and output space.
Our results challenge the traditional interpretation of how LLMs understand language, with several linguistic and engineering implications. Samuele Marro, Davide Evangelista, Xuanqiang Angelo Huang, Emanuele La Malfa, Michele Lombardi 0001, Michael J. Wooldridge |
ICLR | 3 |