Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yinjia Shu

dblp:430/7434 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Segmentation and scene understanding · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
concept unlearning
1.012026
Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
foundation model segmentation
1.012026
Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning
1.012026
Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.312026
Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge distillation · 1.0attention suppression · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Forget What Has Seen: Selective Concept Unlearning in Segmentation Foundation Models
abstract
Machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a critical tool for removing sensitive or personal information from machine learning models, empowering individuals with the right to be forgotten. While MU has achieved success in classification and generative tasks, whether this technique can be effectively applied to segmentation foundation models remains uncertain. To address this issue, we propose an efficient method, Selective Concept Unlearning (SCU), to unlearn the segmentation capability of target concepts. SCU consists of several key aspects: (1) The Multi-level Forgetting Module, designed with a hierarchical three-level suppression strategy, including (i) distillation-level: Negative distillation steers model’s output distribution away from teacher’s correct outputs, erasing its learned concept recognition. (ii) attention-level: Attention suppression minimizes model’s attention to target regions. (iii) output-level: Directly erases predictions for the target by relabeling as background. (2) The Preservation Module ensures maintaining segmentation quality for non-target concepts. Additionally, we introduce a set of metrics to evaluate segmentation unlearning methods. Experiments demonstrate that SCU consistently outperforms existing baselines.
Miaozeng Du, Jiaqi Li 0031, Sirui Pan, Guilin Qi, Rihui Jin, Yinjia Shu, Qianshan Wei
AAAI8