Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aref Mohammadzadeh

dblp:430/9793 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 70% Computational complexity · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
decidability
1.012026
Generalized Decidability via Brouwer Trees · LICS 2026
Logic in computer science › type theory
homotopy type theory
1.012026
Generalized Decidability via Brouwer Trees · LICS 2026
Logic in computer science
type theory
1.012026
Generalized Decidability via Brouwer Trees · LICS 2026
Logic in computer science
constructive mathematics
0.312026
Generalized Decidability via Brouwer Trees · LICS 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

homotopy type theory · 1.0cubical agda · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Generalized Decidability via Brouwer Trees
abstract
In the setting of constructive mathematics, we suggest and study a framework for decidability of properties, which allows for finer distinctions than just "decidable, semidecidable, or undecidable". We work in homotopy type theory and use Brouwer tree ordinals to specify the level of decidability of a property. In this framework, we express the property that a proposition is α-decidable, for an ordinal α, and show that it generalizes decidability and semidecidability. Further generalizing known results, we show that α-decidable propositions are closed under binary conjunction, and discuss for which α they are closed under binary disjunction. We prove that if each P(i) is semidecidable, then the countable meet ∀ i ∈ ℕ. P(i) is ω²-decidable, and similar results for countable joins and iterated quantifiers. We also discuss the relationship with countable choice. All our results are formalized in Cubical Agda.
Tom de Jong, Nicolai Kraus, Aref Mohammadzadeh, Fredrik Nordvall Forsberg
LICS3