Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ferdinand Genans

dblp:431/2210 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
2.732026
Fast and Large-Scale Unbalanced Optimal Transport via its Semi-Dual and Adaptive Gradient Methods · COLT 2026
Stochastic Optimization in Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport: Convergence Analysis and Minimax Rate · NeurIPS 2025
Decreasing Entropic Regularization Averaged Gradient for Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
1.722025
Stochastic Optimization in Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport: Convergence Analysis and Minimax Rate · NeurIPS 2025
Decreasing Entropic Regularization Averaged Gradient for Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
adaptive gradient methods
1.012026
Fast and Large-Scale Unbalanced Optimal Transport via its Semi-Dual and Adaptive Gradient Methods · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
1.012026
Fast and Large-Scale Unbalanced Optimal Transport via its Semi-Dual and Adaptive Gradient Methods · COLT 2026
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
unbalanced optimal transport
1.012026
Fast and Large-Scale Unbalanced Optimal Transport via its Semi-Dual and Adaptive Gradient Methods · COLT 2026
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis
0.912025
Stochastic Optimization in Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport: Convergence Analysis and Minimax Rate · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
entropic optimal transport
0.912025
Decreasing Entropic Regularization Averaged Gradient for Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
semi-discrete optimal transport
0.912025
Stochastic Optimization in Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport: Convergence Analysis and Minimax Rate · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic gradient methods
stochastic gradient descent
0.912025
Decreasing Entropic Regularization Averaged Gradient for Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 2.9semi-dual formulation · 2.0nesterov acceleration · 2.0minimax rate analysis · 0.9entropic regularization · 0.9averaged gradient · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Fast and Large-Scale Unbalanced Optimal Transport via its Semi-Dual and Adaptive Gradient Methods
abstract
Unbalanced Optimal Transport (UOT) has emerged as a robust relaxation of standard Optimal Transport, particularly effective for handling outliers and mass variations. However, scalable algorithms for UOT, specifically those based on Gradient Descent (SGD), remain largely underexplored. In this work, we address this gap by analyzing the semi-dual formulation of Entropic UOT and demonstrating its suitability for adaptive gradient methods. While the semi-dual is a standard tool for large-scale balanced OT, its geometry in the unbalanced setting appears ill-conditioned under standard analysis. Specifically, worst-case bounds on the marginal penalties using $\chi^2$ divergence suggest a condition number scaling with $n/\varepsilon$, implying poor scalability. In contrast, we show that the local condition number actually scales as $\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon)$, effectively removing the ill-conditioned dependence on $n$. Exploiting this property, we prove that SGD methods adapt to this local curvature, achieving a convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(n/\varepsilon T)$ in the stochastic and online regimes, making it suitable for large-scale and semi-discrete applications. Finally, for the full batch discrete setting, we derive a nearly tight upper bound on local smoothness depending solely on the gradient. Using it to adapt step sizes, we propose a modified Adaptive Nesterov Accelerated Gradient (ANAG) method on the semi-dual functional and prove that it achieves a local complexity of $\mathcal{O}(n^2\sqrt{1/\varepsilon}\ln(1/\delta))$.
Ferdinand Genans
COLT1
2025 Decreasing Entropic Regularization Averaged Gradient for Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport
abstract
Adding entropic regularization to Optimal Transport (OT) problems has become a standard approach for designing efficient and scalable solvers. However, regularization introduces a bias from the true solution. To mitigate this bias while still benefiting from the acceleration provided by regularization, a natural solver would adaptively decrease the regularization as it approaches the solution. Although some algorithms heuristically implement this idea, their theoretical guarantees and the extent of their acceleration compared to using a fixed regularization remain largely open. In the setting of semi-discrete OT, where the source measure is continuous and the target is discrete, we prove that decreasing the regularization can indeed accelerate convergence. To this end, we introduce DRAG: Decreasing (entropic) Regularization Averaged Gradient, a stochastic gradient descent algorithm where the regularization decreases with the number of optimization steps. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that DRAG benefits from decreasing regularization compared to a fixed scheme, achieving an unbiased $\mathcal{O}(1/t)$ sample and iteration complexity for both the OT cost and the potential estimation, and a $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{t})$ rate for the OT map. Our theoretical findings are supported by numerical experiments that validate the effectiveness of DRAG and highlight its practical advantages.
Ferdinand Genans, Antoine Godichon-Baggioni, François-Xavier Vialard, Olivier Wintenberger
NeurIPS1
2025 Stochastic Optimization in Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport: Convergence Analysis and Minimax Rate
abstract
We investigate the semi-discrete Optimal Transport (OT) problem, where a continuous source measure $\mu$ is transported to a discrete target measure $\nu$, with particular attention to the OT map approximation. In this setting, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) based solvers have demonstrated strong empirical performance in recent machine learning applications, yet their theoretical guarantee to approximate the OT map is an open question. In this work, we answer it positively by providing both computational and statistical convergence guarantees of SGD. Specifically, we show that SGD methods can estimate the OT map with a minimax convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{n})$, where $n$ is the number of samples drawn from $\mu$. To establish this result, we study the averaged projected SGD algorithm, and identify a suitable projection set that contains a minimizer of the objective, even when the source measure is not compactly supported. Our analysis holds under mild assumptions on the source measure and applies to MTW cost functions,whic include $\|\cdot\|^p$ for $p \in (1, \infty)$. We finally provide numerical evidence for our theoretical results.
Ferdinand Genans, Antoine Godichon-Baggioni, François-Xavier Vialard, Olivier Wintenberger
NeurIPS1