Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuhua Xu 0011
dblp:431/2770
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 87% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph anomaly detection
graph fraud detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.0hypergraph attention · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive LearningabstractGraph fraud detection (GFD) on transaction networks is crucial for safeguarding financial systems. However, due to the limited perspective of existing graph neural networks (GNNs) in the single transaction view, sophisticated fraudsters can disguise themselves to exhibit weak fraud signals, appearing as borderline fraudsters. To address this challenge, we propose MH-LGC, a multi-view hypergraph fraud detection model with large language model (LLM) guided contrastive learning. MH-LGC tackles two key limitations of existing GNN-based GFD methods: (1) Due to the local aggregation mechanism, existing methods struggle to capture high-order trading patterns among distant fraudsters. MH-LGC introduces two temporal hyper-views as complements to the transaction view and employs a Temporal Hypergraph Attention Network (THAN) to integrate the three views. (2) Most GFD methods overlook the rich semantic cues embedded in transaction data. Although some general graph learning studies have explored LLM integration, the high computational overhead and task-specific fine-tuning make them impractical for GFD tasks. MH-LGC introduces a semantic view through a fine-tuning-free LLM-Guided Contrastive learning (LGC), adopting a novel paradigm for integrating GNN and LLM to reduce the computational overhead of LLM. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that MH-LGC outperforms twelve state-of-the-art baselines, with AUC improvements ranging from 1.10% to 5.70%. Rui Ou, Kun Zhu 0024, Jiangtong Li, Chaochao Chen 0001, Yuhua Xu 0011, Changjun Jiang 0002 |
AAAI | 6 |