Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tine Rønning Pedersen

dblp:432/9696 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-7450-7736ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 50% Design research and methods · 50%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods › design space
design space exploration
1.012026
Breaking News or Breaking Trust? Exploring Challenges and a Design Space for Trustworthy LLM Integration in Journalism · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prototyping · 1.0interviews · 1.0design space mapping · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Breaking News or Breaking Trust? Exploring Challenges and a Design Space for Trustworthy LLM Integration in Journalism
abstract
LLM-infused tools have entered the newsroom, transforming journalistic work practices. A few studies have investigated how LLMs influence journalistic practices, but there is a lack of research on how to design LLM-infused tools to support trustworthy journalism. In this paper, we explore how prototyping within a defined design space can help identify and explore the challenges of trustworthy LLM integration in journalism. We conduct eight interviews with news industry stakeholders and identify five challenges for trustworthy journalism arising with the introduction of LLMs: factuality, neutrality, autonomy, efficiency, and AI literacy. Based on these challenges, we map a design space and iteratively explore four prototypes of interactive interfaces promoting trustworthy LLM-infused journalism, which are evaluated with news industry stakeholders. We discuss opportunities and conflicts within the design space, how interactive interfaces can be used to concretize guidelines for AI use, and challenges in incorporating Explainable AI into everyday tools for journalists.
Tine Rønning Pedersen, Klara Øvlisen, Luke Connelly, Ira Assent, Marianne Graves Petersen
CHI1