Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tine Rønning Pedersen
dblp:432/9696
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-7450-7736ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 50% Design research and methods · 50% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Design research and methods › design space
design space exploration |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Breaking News or Breaking Trust? Exploring Challenges and a Design Space for Trustworthy LLM Integration in Journalism · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prototyping · 1.0interviews · 1.0design space mapping · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Breaking News or Breaking Trust? Exploring Challenges and a Design Space for Trustworthy LLM Integration in JournalismabstractLLM-infused tools have entered the newsroom, transforming journalistic work practices. A few studies have investigated how LLMs influence journalistic practices, but there is a lack of research on how to design LLM-infused tools to support trustworthy journalism. In this paper, we explore how prototyping within a defined design space can help identify and explore the challenges of trustworthy LLM integration in journalism. We conduct eight interviews with news industry stakeholders and identify five challenges for trustworthy journalism arising with the introduction of LLMs: factuality, neutrality, autonomy, efficiency, and AI literacy. Based on these challenges, we map a design space and iteratively explore four prototypes of interactive interfaces promoting trustworthy LLM-infused journalism, which are evaluated with news industry stakeholders. We discuss opportunities and conflicts within the design space, how interactive interfaces can be used to concretize guidelines for AI use, and challenges in incorporating Explainable AI into everyday tools for journalists. Tine Rønning Pedersen, Klara Øvlisen, Luke Connelly, Ira Assent, Marianne Graves Petersen |
CHI | 1 |