Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Alicia T. H. Liu

dblp:433/0937 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-1331-6775ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 50% Collaborative and social computing · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
AI-assisted writing
1.012026
Writing with AI Can Reduce Gender Bias in Hiring Evaluations · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

preregistered experiment · 2.0latent analysis · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Writing with AI Can Reduce Gender Bias in Hiring Evaluations
abstract
Women remain underrepresented in the workplace, partly due to stereotypes associating competence traits with men rather than women. Efforts to change such stereotypes often yield mixed results. As language models become integrated into daily life, AI writing assistants offer an opportunity to shift gender images. In a preregistered experiment (N = 672), participants evaluated résumés for a female (“Jennifer”) and a male (“John”) candidate applying to a financial analyst role. They wrote evaluations using AI-generated suggestions in one of three conditions: suggestions for Jennifer integrated stereotypically male, female, or neutral traits. Suggestions for John remained neutral. Participants exposed to male-trait suggestions evaluated Jennifer as more competent, selected her as the leader, and offered higher salaries. However, we also observed signs of backlash: participants were less willing to work with competent Jennifer. We discuss implications for designing AI writing assistants to mitigate gender bias in hiring contexts.
Alicia T. H. Liu, Mina Lee 0002, Xuechunzi Bai
CHI1