Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Max Ohsawa

dblp:433/0950 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6944-8063ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
identity work
1.012026
LL.me: Supporting Identity Work through Human-AI Alignment · CHI 2026
Collaborative and social computing
self-representation
1.012026
LL.me: Supporting Identity Work through Human-AI Alignment · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 2.0large language model · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LL.me: Supporting Identity Work through Human-AI Alignment
abstract
Professional self-representation involves constructing identities that reflect personal values while aligning with the norms of professional communities. Many people turn to generative AI for help, but misalignments between LLM outputs and self-understanding hinder authenticity and accuracy of the content. To explore how LLMs can support co-creation aligned, authentic self-representational content, we designed LL.me, a web-based probe based on bi-directional alignment that utilizes users’ resumes and guides them through iterative cycles of refining AI-generated self-representations. Our user study with 14 participants showed users engaged in identity work with the tool, re-framing content to emphasize their personal values, imparting tacit knowledge from their communities of practice, and leveraging system explainability features as a proxy for how the representation would be perceived by others. We demonstrate how LLM-based tools can facilitate a co-constructive process of identity formation, helping individuals actively shape their professional self-representations in collaboration with the AI.
Kaely Hall, Max Ohsawa, Vedant Das Swain, Jennifer G. Kim
CHI2