Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Max Ohsawa
dblp:433/0950
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6944-8063ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
identity work |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LL.me: Supporting Identity Work through Human-AI Alignment · CHI 2026 |
Collaborative and social computing
self-representation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LL.me: Supporting Identity Work through Human-AI Alignment · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 2.0large language model · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | LL.me: Supporting Identity Work through Human-AI AlignmentabstractProfessional self-representation involves constructing identities that reflect personal values while aligning with the norms of professional communities. Many people turn to generative AI for help, but misalignments between LLM outputs and self-understanding hinder authenticity and accuracy of the content. To explore how LLMs can support co-creation aligned, authentic self-representational content, we designed LL.me, a web-based probe based on bi-directional alignment that utilizes users’ resumes and guides them through iterative cycles of refining AI-generated self-representations. Our user study with 14 participants showed users engaged in identity work with the tool, re-framing content to emphasize their personal values, imparting tacit knowledge from their communities of practice, and leveraging system explainability features as a proxy for how the representation would be perceived by others. We demonstrate how LLM-based tools can facilitate a co-constructive process of identity formation, helping individuals actively shape their professional self-representations in collaboration with the AI. Kaely Hall, Max Ohsawa, Vedant Das Swain, Jennifer G. Kim |
CHI | 2 |