Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bingning (Jolin) Liu

dblp:433/1061 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-3807-829XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usable security › usable privacy
privacy communication
1.012026
Depictions of Privacy Invasion and Surveillance in Artworks and Potential Lessons For Privacy Communication · CHI 2026
Design research and methods
speculative design
0.312026
Depictions of Privacy Invasion and Surveillance in Artworks and Potential Lessons For Privacy Communication · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 2.0artwork corpus analysis · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Depictions of Privacy Invasion and Surveillance in Artworks and Potential Lessons For Privacy Communication
abstract
User-facing communication about privacy (e.g., privacy policies, privacy tools’ user interfaces) is frequently ignored and often ineffective. In contrast to these arguably staid interfaces, artworks often focus on provocation, engagement, and critical interpretation. For decades, artists have created privacy art—artistic media in galleries relating to the surveillance and privacy of individuals. What are artists saying about privacy, and how? Crucially, what lessons might they have for designing privacy-focused user interfaces? To this end, we compiled over 800 privacy artworks, qualitatively analyzing a sample. Common topics spanned artistic media (from paintings to immersive installations) and eras. Artworks built upon familiar concepts (e.g., cameras, homes) to speculate on society’s future and present personal information (e.g., artist, viewer, public). We discuss lessons for making non-artistic privacy communication more engaging and powerful through directing attention (e.g., lighting, collage) and setting a tone (e.g., unsettling, fun, mundane).
Tess Eschebach, Emma I. C. Peterson, Nathaniel Kim, Bingning (Jolin) Liu, Marc Downie, Douglas Pancoast, Blase Ur
CHI4