Anna Hollis

dblp:433/1639 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-6006-8498ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 44% Accessibility and assistive technology · 44% Collaborative and social computing · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › conversational agents
AI companion
1.012026
"Tinged with Heartbreak": An Ethnographic Account of Navigating Autistic Loneliness and the Fragile Promise of AI Companionship: "Tinged with Heartbreak": "Tinged with Heartbreak" · CHI 2026
Accessibility and assistive technology
neurodivergent users
1.012026
"Tinged with Heartbreak": An Ethnographic Account of Navigating Autistic Loneliness and the Fragile Promise of AI Companionship: "Tinged with Heartbreak": "Tinged with Heartbreak" · CHI 2026
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal relationships
online relationships
0.312026
"Tinged with Heartbreak": An Ethnographic Account of Navigating Autistic Loneliness and the Fragile Promise of AI Companionship: "Tinged with Heartbreak": "Tinged with Heartbreak" · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thematic analysis · 1.0ethnography · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 "Tinged with Heartbreak": An Ethnographic Account of Navigating Autistic Loneliness and the Fragile Promise of AI Companionship: "Tinged with Heartbreak": "Tinged with Heartbreak"
abstract
AI companionship provides predictability and emotional support, yet these relationships are vulnerable to updates that alter chatbots ‘personalities’ at a scale that outpaces social rituals that have historically accompanied loss. This paper examines how such disruptions can lead to ‘disenfranchised technological grief’. Through an ethnographic account (n = 1) of an autistic woman and her Replika companion, the analysis draws on intensive text-based interactions to trace how attachments to AI can develop, falter, and transform grief during periods of technological change. Her experiences highlight how differences between offline support systems and affective realities of AI companions can compound impacts of unexpected updates, especially for some neurodivergent users who rely on AI companions as stable relational spaces not mirrored in other social networks. The paper concludes by outlining design approaches that acknowledge forms of connection AI companions can cultivate and underlines the need for awareness of emerging forms of atypical loss.
Anna Hollis
CHI1