Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthew James Buckman

dblp:433/2296 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-7748-2413ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 77% Immersive interaction · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
deaf and hard of hearing technology
1.012026
Reclaiming VR Design Authority: Deaf Signers Shaping Immersive Classrooms · CHI 2026
Immersive interaction
virtual reality
0.312026
Reclaiming VR Design Authority: Deaf Signers Shaping Immersive Classrooms · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative interviews · 1.0prototype evaluation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Reclaiming VR Design Authority: Deaf Signers Shaping Immersive Classrooms
abstract
Deaf students face a persistent visual attention split between signer and instructional materials. Although virtual reality (VR) is often promoted as an educational solution, it typically reinforces hearing norms (e.g., caption overlays or interpreter boxes onto hearing classrooms). Our work foregrounds Deaf leadership and reclaims VR design authority: in a mixed-hearing team led by Deaf scholars, we designed and evaluated a VR classroom prototype featuring three signer-placement modes: corner, parallel, and transparent. Twelve Deaf participants explored the prototype during a 15-minute lecture and participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews. Participants reported reduced attention split and improved visibility, and suggested VR may support flexibility and comprehension in Deaf learning. From these reflections, we introduce a five-dimension conceptual framework—proximity, customizability, visual efficiency, cultural fit, and task flexibility—that organizes how Deaf signers evaluate signer placements. This work moves Deaf Tech theory into practice, opening pathways for future Deaf-centered, culturally grounded HCI.
Shuxu Huffman, Laura South, Matthew James Buckman, Raja S. Kushalnagar, Francisco R. Ortega 0001, Abraham Glasser
CHI3