Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Bencard

dblp:433/2309 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2500-9023ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 50% Design research and methods · 50%
Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
critical design
1.012026
Digitizing the Dead: Understanding 'Data Hauntings' to Support Equitable Data Work with Human Remains · CHI 2026
Collaborative and social computing › knowledge work
data work
1.012026
Digitizing the Dead: Understanding 'Data Hauntings' to Support Equitable Data Work with Human Remains · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

taxonomy development · 2.0interview study · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Digitizing the Dead: Understanding 'Data Hauntings' to Support Equitable Data Work with Human Remains
abstract
Thousands of human remains are stored in museums and collections worldwide. But while their collection, handling and display are increasingly subjected to ethical guidelines and regulations, institutional guidelines and research on their digitization are scarce. This study explores the challenges and opportunities of digitizing human remains, outlining new directions. Based on interviews (n=23) with museum professionals across 14 organizations worldwide, we map: 1) A taxonomy of data work with human remains; 2) Main areas of uncertainties in data work and adaptive strategies currently employed to address them; 3) Examples of ill-fitting digital systems. We introduce the concept of ‘data hauntings’ to highlight the historical, technical and regulatory ghosts lingering in digital systems of contested assets, and the specters of future data circulation. Lastly, we propose a ‘hauntological’ framework for rethinking, (re)designing and maintaining digital systems to enable equitable data work - balancing historical trace-ability, ethical accountability and searchability.
Valeria Borsotti, Adam Bencard, Luigina Ciolfi
CHI2