Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rochelle Campbell-Esen

dblp:433/3088 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-4557-8584ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 56% Human-AI interaction · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › responsible AI
AI ethics
1.012026
Co-Designing Islamic AI Ethics: Insights from the UK Muslim Community · CHI 2026
Design research and methods
participatory design
1.012026
Co-Designing Islamic AI Ethics: Insights from the UK Muslim Community · CHI 2026
Design research and methods › participatory design
community-based design
0.312026
Co-Designing Islamic AI Ethics: Insights from the UK Muslim Community · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thematic analysis · 1.0co-design workshops · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Co-Designing Islamic AI Ethics: Insights from the UK Muslim Community
abstract
AI governance frameworks are predominantly shaped by Western, secular values, which risks excluding the perspectives of 1.9 billion Muslims whose ethical reasoning is grounded in Islamic principles. To address this gap, we conducted co-design workshops with 12 Muslim women, to identify Islamic ethical values for AI systems and examine how these compare to the UK AI White Paper. Our analysis revealed four themes that complement and challenge assumptions in secular AI governance, (1) Honesty, Transparency, and Trustworthiness; (2) Knowledge, Responsibility, and Divine Accountability; (3) Justice, Power, and Equity; and (4) Unity, Inclusivity, and Diversity. Our findings present Islamic ethical AI processes, including Hadith authentication for verification, collective consultation (shūrā), and wealth distribution (zakat) for restorative and re-distributive justice. This paper contributes to calls for decolonial AI governance and offers the HCI community an Islamic understanding of AI ethics to broaden debates beyond Western paradigms.
Rochelle Campbell-Esen, Jamie Mahoney, Reem Talhouk
CHI1