Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fariba Emami

dblp:433/4443 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-1322-7987ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 50% Visualization and visual analytics · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Wearable and physiological sensing · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality
eye tracking
1.012026
Pixels, Plants, and People: Affective Evaluation of Urban Green Spaces · CHI 2026
Visualization and visual analytics
visual attention
1.012026
Pixels, Plants, and People: Affective Evaluation of Urban Green Spaces · CHI 2026
Human-robot interaction › emotion
emotional response
1.012026
Pixels, Plants, and People: Affective Evaluation of Urban Green Spaces · CHI 2026
Wearable and physiological sensing
brain sensing
0.312026
Pixels, Plants, and People: Affective Evaluation of Urban Green Spaces · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

eye tracking · 2.0EEG · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Pixels, Plants, and People: Affective Evaluation of Urban Green Spaces
abstract
Urban green spaces are critical for well-being, yet planners lack scalable ways to anticipate how environments will be perceived by users. We conducted an experiment with 27 participants who viewed 30 images of urban spaces while eye movements and brain activity were recorded. Image composition, parsed into 14 urban classes and aggregated as vegetation versus non-vegetation, systematically predicted responses: a higher proportion of vegetation drew more visual attention and was associated with higher attractiveness ratings, while images with less greenery elicited stronger pupillary responses. Brain signal analysis showed topographic patterns in theta and alpha activity between pleasant and unpleasant scenes, although differences were not statistically significant. Taken together, our findings highlight systematic links between urban scene composition, user attention, and affective responses. We release our dataset and software to support further research.
Kayhan Latifzadeh, Parvin Emami, Fariba Emami, Saravanakumar Duraisamy, Luis A. Leiva
CHI3