Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Makayla Chang

dblp:433/5073 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-6507-8218ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Haptics and multimodal interaction › multimodal communication
multimodal instruction
1.012026
How Humans Naturally Refer to Targets: Understanding Multimodal Instruction Patterns in Human-Robot Interaction · CHI 2026
Haptics and multimodal interaction
multimodal interaction
0.312026
How Humans Naturally Refer to Targets: Understanding Multimodal Instruction Patterns in Human-Robot Interaction · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal data collection · 1.0behavioral study · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 How Humans Naturally Refer to Targets: Understanding Multimodal Instruction Patterns in Human-Robot Interaction
abstract
Current multimodal instruction-recognition algorithms in human-robot interaction, developed largely from a purely technical perspective, remain rigid and incomplete in their use of human communicative cues. Therefore, a full understanding of how humans naturally refer to targets in interaction is central to enabling robots to interpret and act on user instructions. To investigate this, we collected multimodal behavior data from 30 participants who naturally instructed a robot for household tasks while we systematically varied target distance, direction, and local referent complexity. Our results show that speech instructions were often vague and lacked explicit target-position information. To resolve this ambiguity, multimodal cues are essential: gaze direction provides an order-of-magnitude improvement in target-localization accuracy, while hand pointing, head turns, and speech onset offer reliable temporal anchors for identifying target-directed gaze. We also found that speech patterns varied with distance and local referent complexity, whereas multimodal behaviors shifted with target direction, underscoring the need for context-adaptive recognition and interface design.
Lesong Jia, Makayla Chang, Na Du
CHI2