EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hera Koo
dblp:435/2682
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-9856-0608ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 91% Cloud and datacenter computing · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › computational storage
compaction offloading |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Near-Data Compaction for LSM Tree on Rack-Scale Disaggregated Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026 |
Storage systems › distributed storage
disaggregated storage |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Near-Data Compaction for LSM Tree on Rack-Scale Disaggregated Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026 |
Storage systems › key-value storage
LSM-tree |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Near-Data Compaction for LSM Tree on Rack-Scale Disaggregated Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
selective compaction admission · 1.0dual-node coordination · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Near-Data Compaction for LSM Tree on Rack-Scale Disaggregated StorageabstractIn LSM trees, background compaction tasks contend with foreground queries for CPU cycles, cache space, and also SAN bandwidth, if deployed in a disaggregated storage architecture. This study proposesNear-Data Compaction(NDC), which executes compaction on the storage node to utilize its underutilized computing resources. However, enabling NDC introduces several challenges. First, it has to support concurrent file access from both compute and storage nodes. In addition, it has to decide which compaction tasks to be executed on the storage node since the computing resources of a storage node are not unlimited. This study presentsTetherDB, an LSM tree for disaggregated storage architecture that addresses these challenges through lightweight dual-node coordination and selective NDC admission policies. Our evaluation demonstrates that TetherDB improves throughput by up to 2.1× compared to RocksDB in write-heavy workloads. Sungho Moon, Daegyu Han, Hera Koo, Sangeun Chae, Duck-Ho Bae, Euiseong Seo, Beomseok Nam |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 3 |