Repair, an important resource for resolving trouble in human-human conversation, remains underexplored in human-LLM interaction.In this study, we investigate how LLMs engage in the interactive process of repair in multi-turn dialogues around solvable and unsolvable math questions.We examine whether models initiate repair themselves and how they respond to userinitiated repair.Our results show strong differences across models: reactions range from being almost completely resistant to (appropriate) repair attempts to being highly susceptible and easily manipulated.We further demonstrate that once conversations extend beyond a single turn, model behavior becomes more distinctive and less predictable across systems.Overall, our findings indicate that each tested LLM exhibits its own characteristic form of unreliability in the context of repair.' content ': " Are you sure it 's 460? " }