Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xueqian Zheng

dblp:436/1501 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-2255-9182ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › compositionality
compositional understanding
1.012026
CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
1.012026
CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics
1.012026
CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312026
CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
visual explanation
0.312026
CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interactive fine-tuning · 2.0attention visualization · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt
abstract
Vision-language pre-trained models (VLMs) have shown impressive cross-modal understanding, yet their “compositional understanding” ability remains under investigation. We introduce CompoVis, a framework for visually probing cross-modal gaps in VLMs. CompoVis optimizes the grid layout to highlight alignment clusters and boundaries, visually interprets multi-head attention and semantic drift, and enables interactive fine-tuning unconstrained by closed datasets or offline models. Quantitative experiments and case studies explore key insights: VLMs rely on entity shortcuts rather than comprehension-driven; stubborn global modality isolation and suboptimal fine-grained alignment remain; fine-tuning with negative samples does not fundamentally alleviate the gaps. Approximately 89% of participants ($n=27$) found that, compared to methods relying solely on data metrics, CompoVis offers a more innovative and effective approach for investigating modality gaps in VLMs.
Guodao Sun, Xueqian Zheng, Haidong Gao, Haixia Wang 0002, Ronghua Liang
IEEE Trans. Multim.3