Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xueqian Zheng
dblp:436/1501
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-2255-9182ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › compositionality
compositional understanding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026 |
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
visual explanation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis Attempt · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interactive fine-tuning · 2.0attention visualization · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CompoVis: Is Cross-Modal Semantic Alignment of CLIP Optimal? A Visual Analysis AttemptabstractVision-language pre-trained models (VLMs) have shown impressive cross-modal understanding, yet their “compositional understanding” ability remains under investigation. We introduce CompoVis, a framework for visually probing cross-modal gaps in VLMs. CompoVis optimizes the grid layout to highlight alignment clusters and boundaries, visually interprets multi-head attention and semantic drift, and enables interactive fine-tuning unconstrained by closed datasets or offline models. Quantitative experiments and case studies explore key insights: VLMs rely on entity shortcuts rather than comprehension-driven; stubborn global modality isolation and suboptimal fine-grained alignment remain; fine-tuning with negative samples does not fundamentally alleviate the gaps. Approximately 89% of participants ($n=27$) found that, compared to methods relying solely on data metrics, CompoVis offers a more innovative and effective approach for investigating modality gaps in VLMs. Guodao Sun, Xueqian Zheng, Haidong Gao, Haixia Wang 0002, Ronghua Liang |
IEEE Trans. Multim. | 3 |